Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

From: jj piontek [mailto:jjmjpiontek@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:55 PM
To: Comments
Subject: RIN 3064-AC50

October 12, 2004

Mr. Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW
Washington DC 20429

Ref: RIN 3064-AC50

Dear Mr. Feldman,

As a concerned citizen and a Christian who cares about those who are the least among us, I urge you to withdraw the FDIC proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).

By requiring banks with assets greater than $250 million to comply with the ³three point audit test² of lending, investing, and providing banking services to low- and middle-income communities, the CRA has been one of the most successful community development programs. The CRA had provided $1.5 trillion for housing developments, medical clinics, and other community projects that would never have been completed without the CRA.

Now your proposal will increase the small bank definition to banks with assets under one billion dollars. Thus, the ³three point audit test² will no longer apply to most banks throughout the U.S. In my state of Illinois, this will leave only 13 banks that will still be required to meet the stricter lending, investing, and services standards. This will result in fewer loans and investments in affordable housing projects, clinics, community centers, and economic development projects. Along with the
Section 8 housing voucher changes that result in less housing for poor residents, I believe the loss of loans and investments in affordable housing projects will worsen the already difficult low- and middle-income housing situation.

Your proposed changes do not uphold the purposes of the CRA. They should be withdrawn.

Sincerely,
Julia K. Piontek



Last Updated 10/30/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024