Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

September 15, 2004

Mr. Robert E. Feldman Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW 20429

RE: RIN 3064-AC50

Dear Mr. Feldman:

As a concerned Maine citizen, I urge you to withdraw your proposed chang'to tt Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations. CRA has been instrumental  in increasing homeownership and economic development. Your proposed changes are contrary to the CRA because they will slow down the progress made in community reinvestment.

I understand that CRA exams look at the number of loans, investments, and services that banks with more than $250 million in assets make to low- and moderate-income communities. Your proposal will eliminate the investment and service parts of the CRA exam for banks with assets between $250 million and $1 billion.

To replace the investment and service parts of the CRA exam, the FDIC proposes to add an inadequate community development criterion. Mid-size banks with assets between $250 million and $1 billion would only have to engage in one of three activities: community development lending, investing or services. Currently, mid-size banks must engage in all three activities. I believe that the end result will be significantly fewer loans and investments in affordable rental housing, health clinics, community centers, and economic development projects.

The elimination of the service test will also have harmful consequences for low- and moderate-income communities. CRA examiners will no longer expect mid-size banks to place bank branches in low- and moderate-income communities. Mid-size banks will no longer make efforts to provide affordable checking and savings accounts to consumers with modest incomes. In addition, your proposal eliminates small business lending data reporting for mid-size banks. Without data on lending to small businesses, the public cannot hold mid-size banks accountable for responding to the credit needs of small businesses.

You propose that community development activities in rural areas can benefit any group of individuals instead of only low- and moderate-income individuals. Since a large number of rural residents are rich, your proposal threatens to divert community development activities away from the low- and moderate-income communities and consumers that is the focus of CRA.

In conclusion, your proposal is directly the opposite of CRA's mandate of imposing an obligation to meet community needs. Two other federal agencies did not embark upon the path you are taking because they recognized the harm it would cause. CRA is too vital to be gutted by regulators. If you do not reverse your proposed course of action, I will ask that Congress halt your efforts before the damage is done.

Sincerely

Hannah Thomas

Cc: National Community Reinvestment Coalition
President George W. Bush
Senators John Kerry and John Edwards

Last Updated 10/20/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024