| CITY-COUNTY REINVESTMENT TASK FORCE Mr. Robert FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 
        17th Street NW
 Washington DC. 20429-9990
 Re: RIN 3064-AC50 Dear Mr. Feldman; The City County 
        Reinvestment Task Force (RTF) is chartered by the City Council and 
        County Board of Supervisors to monitor lending practices and develop 
        strategies for reinvestment in the region. It was established by joint 
        resolution in 1977 and is Co-Chaired by the City Council and the County 
        Board of Supervisors. It has an extraordinary record of success in 
        facilitating access to capital in underserved markets generating 
        billions of home loans, small business loans, affordable housing and 
        community investments ($1.9B in 2003). Through local attention to the 
        CRA and long term strategic planning and analysis the CRA has become one 
        of the primary tools for community stability and revitalization in the 
        region. These accomplishments occur because of the "partnership' that 
        has been forged between community, lenders and government. The 
        partnership depends on each party bringing its full authority and 
        potential to the work.  Government has provided much protection and risk diversion with 
        affordable housing, investments and small micro lending efforts. This 
        was offered with the confidence that the lenders would equally commit. 
        The RTF has done constant and disciplined assessment of credit access 
        and through dialogue, face to face, many new and innovative solutions 
        have been created, so much so that a thriving and profitable "industry" 
        has emerged in this region focused on economically healthy communities.
         Unfortunately one of the least accessible or available players has 
        not been at the table and has not strategically benefited or been a 
        player in this twenty-five year initiative. Strangely enough it is banks 
        under $1Billion that have pushed themselves away from the challenge and 
        avoided major or vital commitments. Even when efforts were very near 
        geographically or directly in concert with their primary business plan 
        the small banks have refused to work in concert with the major lenders, 
        the community and government.
         Why? Having observed and worked with many financial institutions it is my 
        assessment that smaller banks tend to be focused on serving the primary 
        needs of their boards and developing the bottom line for those small 
        group of key investors. Most of those investors know very little about 
        the potential markets in low and moderate-income communities. They are 
        largely focused on suburban depositors and businesses and lack the 
        resources to look beyond that which is familiar and common to their 
        personal culture.  That is the reason why they seek exemption. They are iconoclastic, 
        maybe self-made men who have assets adequate to create a small bank and 
        micro mange the lending and investment strategies with a myopic eye and 
        a prejudice against foreign markets and ethnic consumers.  By changing the rules and modifying the deposit standards you are 
        directly perpetuating a very divisive and exclusionary national banking 
        policy. I urge you not to do that. All of the research and work that has 
        been done to validate CRA lending and investments as viable profit 
        centers for small banks, as well as large, will be violated. Your 
        decision is based on something other than reality. Please consider the 
        alternative. Do not exempt nks with assets under $1B from the CRA. Sincerely,  Jim Bliesner, Reinvestment DirectorCity and County of San Diego
 625 Broadway-Suite 110, MS-A263
 San Diego, California 92101
 |