| FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GILLETTE 
        From: FNB Operations [mailto:fnbop@fnbgillette.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 1:23 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: CRA Proposal
 September 17, 2004  To: FDICFrom: First National Bank of Gillette, Wyoming
 This is to express our strong support for the FDIC proposal to 
        increase the threshold for small banks to $1 billion for the Community 
        Reinvestment Act.  First National Bank of Gillette is located in a small community in 
        Wyoming with a population of approximately 20,000. Our community is 
        remotely located from larger communities by approximately 150 miles in 
        any direction. We are the only home owned bank in the community and 
        continue to compete with the larger banking organizations that operate 
        branch office in Gillette, including Well Fargo, Community First and U S 
        Bank. We are a single unit bank with no branches and our defined CRA 
        trade is Campbell County, of which Gillette is the principal community. 
        Our entire outreach is to our local community regardless of the activity 
        whether providing banking products and services or participating in 
        local community organizations. It is our local community that supports 
        our organization. Without our local community we would not exist. 
        Additional compliance burdens imposed on our bank from the $250 million 
        threshold provides no direct benefit, only increasing additional 
        documentation requirements to reflect compliance.  We also strongly agree with the proposal opposing the community 
        development criterion a separate test from the bank's overall CRA 
        evaluation.  Our bank has historically participated in various programs intended 
        to provide community development support including participation in the 
        state's housing authority program to government supported programs of 
        FHA, VA and SBA lending products. The bank has financially supported the 
        local community development organization with both financial support and 
        participation on boards by bank officers.  Again, further regulation here only increases the regulatory burden 
        cost and likely would provide no significant improvement in the overall 
        community development activities.  We were extremely disappointed when the proposal to increase the 
        threshold was recently overturned. We have expressed our disappointment 
        and concern to our regulator, the OCC.  There are may communities like Gillette where CRA has no real 
        influence. Such organizations must rely on there local community for 
        growth and profitability. Without supporting your local community you 
        would not exist. No CRA regulation changes this fact. |