| From: Iris Nesbit [mailto:nessieln@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 12:00 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: RIN 3064-AC50
 
 Mr. Robert E. FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 RE: RIN 3064-AC50  Dear Mr. Feldman:  I am a concerned citizen opposed to watering down CRA (Community 
        Reinvestment Act) requirements for mid-sized banks. CRA is vital for 
        increasing homeownership and economic development in lower-income 
        communities. Your proposed changes will halt the progress that has been 
        made.  I understand that banks with over $250 million in assets must be 
        tested on their number of loans, investments, and services to low- and 
        moderate-income communities. But your proposal would eliminate the 
        investment and service requirements for all banks with under $1 billion 
        in assets. This will result in significantly fewer loans and investments 
        in affordable rental housing, health clinics, community centers, and 
        economic development projects.  Native Americans living on reservations are the most unbanked 
        population in the United States. The Navajo Nation, for example, has 5 
        bank branches in total for a population of a quarter of a million people 
        living in an area the size of West Virginia. You can see the same or 
        greater number of branches in a single block in our Nation’s Capital. 
        The proposed changes would only serve to worsen banking services to 
        tribes.  The proposed changes, which would make smaller banks less accountable 
        for their community reinvestment activity, alarm us, as banks are 
        finally waking up to the investment opportunities in Indian country. 
        Indian country has made strides with the help of banks in the mortgage 
        arena—we saw conventional mortgage activity increase for Native 
        Americans in 2003. We believe that the strength of the current law has 
        been instrumental to this development.  The following data point up the severe continuing needs in Indian 
        country, that require a strong CRA. According to the GAO, the rate of 
        homeownership for Native Americans living on reservations is just 33 
        percent, or half that of the general population and substantially lower 
        than that of other minority groups. In addition, Native Americans are 
        four times more likely than the average American family to live in 
        substandard housing. (Fannie Mae data, Testimony, Pattye Greene, May 3, 
        2004, House Financial Services Committee) Overcrowding has been 
        documented in the NAIHC study “Too Few Rooms...” (2001) reporting as 
        many as 25 or even 30 people living in deplorable conditions under one 
        roof in a 2- or 3-bedroom house.  If the watered-down exam was approved, it would allow mid-sized banks 
        to choose which community development activities they will undertake. 
        Right now, these banks must make community development loans, 
        investments, and services. Your proposed test allows banks to choose 
        only one of the three activities. The result will be less community 
        development activity. The recent strides in economic development in 
        Indian country will be lost if banks aren’t required to invest.  You also propose that community development activities in rural areas 
        should benefit any group of individuals instead of only low- and 
        moderate-income individuals. But this will allow banks to cherry-pick 
        and focus on affluent residents of rural areas rather than the lower 
        income consumers CRA targets. Finally, you would also eliminate publicly 
        available data on the small business lending of mid-sized banks. Without 
        data, community groups and citizens cannot hold banks accountable for 
        lending to small businesses in their communities.  Your proposed changes directly oppose CRA’s mandate to require 
        lenders to meet community needs. CRA is too important to be gutted. 
        Please withdraw your proposal, as did two other federal agencies—the 
        Office of Thrifts Supervision and the Federal Reserve—that recognized 
        the harm of similar changes to underserved communities.  Sincerely, Iris N. Nesbit
 1845 Jug Road
 Dover, PA 17315
 Cc: National American Indian Housing Council (fax: 202-789-1754) National Community Reinvestment Coalition (fax: 202-628-9800)
 President George W. Bush (White House fax: 202-456-2461)
 Senators John Kerry (fax: 202-224-8525)
 Senator John Edwards (fax: 202-228-1374)
 
 |