Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

Jane Addams Hull House Association

From: Terri Johnson [mailto:tjohnson@hullhouse.org]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 4:59 PM
To: Comments
Cc: cwood@hullhouse.org; mcausey-drake@hullhouse.org
Subject: Community Reinvestment Act

I am writing on behalf of Jane Addams Hull House Association to oppose the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). If the FDIC adopts these changes, community development activity in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods and rural areas throughout the Chicago region and the nation will be threatened.

The FDICs decision is harmful for a number of reasons. First, the FDIC is the primary regulator of many state chartered banks that frequently fall between $250 million and $1 billion in assets. For institutions active in Illinois in 2003, nearly 40 percent of assets controlled by FDIC-regulated institutions were held by banks with assets between $250 million and $1 billion. Additionally, the proposed changes would dramatically affect the presence of FDIC-regulated institutions in IllinoisLMI and rural communities. An analysis of 2003 banking offices in Illinois urban areas indicates that increasing the asset size of small banks to $1 billion would decrease the number of FDIC-regulated banking offices in Illinois LMI census tracts operated by largebanks by 63 percent. Deposits in LMI branches held by largeFDIC-regulated banks would decline by 68 percent. FDIC-regulated branches controlling nearly $3.4 billion in LMI deposits, or over 10 percent of all LMI deposits state-wide, would shift from largeto smallinstitution status if the asset size of small banks were to increase to $1 billion. Rural areas will be hard hit as well. Just over 1 percent of rural Illinois banking offices operated by FDIC-regulated institutions would be held by largebanks, a decline of 91.5 percent. This shift would represent nearly 8 percent of rural deposits state-wide.

The proposed changes would reduce the number of financial institutions considered largefor CRA purposes. Our organization fears this will threaten access to investments, grants, and services for low- and moderate-income (LMI) communities served by large institutions that would shift to smallstatus under the regulatorsproposal. There is a significant concern that areas predominantly served by mid-sized institutions will be particularly hard hit.

We oppose these changes to the Community Reinvestment Act and ask that FDIC drop this proposal.

Sincerely

Terri A. Johnson
Vice President, Public Policy & Advocacy
Jane Addams Hull House Association
Human Relations Foundation/Jane Addams Policy Initiative
10 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL

 

Last Updated 09/28/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024