Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

Community Bank and Trust

From: Feb1845BU@aol.com [mailto:Feb1845BU@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 1:55 PM
To: Comments
Cc: psmith@aba.com
Subject: RIN No. 3064-AC50 (Proposed Changes to the CRA by the FDIC)

Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20429

Re: RIN Number 3064-AC50: FDIC Proposed Increase in the Threshold for
the Small Bank CRA Streamlined Examination

Dear Mr. Feldman:

I am a Director of Community Bank and Trust, Waco, Texas, a city of approxi-
mately 100,000 residents. Our bank has $270,000,000 in assets, and I am
writing to strongly support the FDIC's proposal to raise the threshold for the
streamlined small bank CRA examination to $1 billion without regard to the
size of the bank's holding company. I understand that this is not an exemption
from CRA and that our bank would still have to help meet the credit needs of our
entire community and be evaluated by our regulator.

I also support the addition of a community development criterion to the small
bank examination for larger community banks. However, I urge the FDIC to
adopt its original $500 million threshold for small banks without a CD criterion
and only apply the new CD criterion to community banks greater than $500 million up to
$1 billion. As FDIC examiners know, it has proven extremely difficult for
small banks to find appropriate CRA qualified investments in their communities. Many
small banks have had to make regional or statewide investments that are
extremely unlikely to ever benefit the banks' own communities. That was certainly
not the intent of Congress when it enacted CRA.

Today, when a small bank goes over $250 million, it must completely reorganize
its CRA program and begin a massive new reporting, monitoring and investment
program. If the FDIC adopt its proposal, a state nonmember bank would move
from the small bank examination to an expanded but still streamlined bank ex-
amination, with the flexibility to mix Community Development loans, services
and investments to meet the new CD criterion.

I strongly oppose making the CD criterion a separate test from the bank's
over- all CRA evaluation. For a community bank, CD lending is not significantly
different from the provision of credit to the entire community. The current small bank
test considers the institution's overall lending in its community. The addition
of a category of CD lending fits well within the concept of serving the whole
community. A separate test would create an additional CD obligation and regulatory burden
that would erode the benefit of the streamlined exam.

Finally, I believe that the FDIC has proposed a major improvement in the CRA
regulations, one that much more closely aligns the regulations with the
Community Reinvestment Act itself, and I urge the FDIC to adopt its proposal, with the
foregoing recommendations.

Sincerely,

Herbert H. Reynolds, Ph.D.,Sc.D.
Director, Community Bank and Trust
Waco, Texas

 

Last Updated 09/27/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024