Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF MILWAUKEE, INC.

From: Sallie Alefsen [mailto:salliea@nhsmilwaukee.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 2:36 PM
To: Comments
Subject:

Mr. Robert E. Feldman

Executive Secretary

Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

550 17th St. NW 20429

RE: RIN 3064-AC50, Community Reinvestment

Dear Mr. Feldman:

As a concerned citizen and a member of the board of directors of the Metropolitan Milwaukee Fairy Housing Council, I am writing to express my opposition to watering down CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) requirements for mid-sized banks. CRA is vital for increasing housing opportunity, homeownership and economic development in lower-income communities. However, changes proposed by the FDIC will halt the progress that has been made.

I understand that currently, banks with over $250 million in assets must be tested on their number of loans, investments, and services to low and moderate income communities. But the proposal would eliminate the investment and service requirements for all banks with under $1 billion in assets. This will result in significantly fewer loans and investments in affordable rental housing, health clinics, community centers, and economic development projects.

In the watered-down exam, the FDIC would allow mid-sized banks to choose which community development activities they will undertake. Right now, these banks must make community development loans, investments, and services. The proposed test allows banks to choose only one of the three activities. The result will be less community development activity.

I am also concerned about the proposal that community development activities in rural areas should benefit any group of individuals instead of only low and moderate income individuals. This would allow banks to work with affluent residents of rural areas rather than the lower income consumers CRA targets.

Finally, the proposal would also eliminate publicly available data on the small business lending of mid-sized banks. Without data, community groups and citizens cannot hold banks accountable for lending to small businesses in their neighborhoods.

The proposed changes directly oppose CRA’s mandate to require lenders to meet community needs. CRA is too important to be gutted. Please drop your proposal. It would harm, rather than help underserved communities.

Sincerely,

Sallie Alefsen
Executive Director
Neighborhood Housing Services of Milwaukee, Inc.
535 North 27th Street
Milwaukee, WI 53208
 

Last Updated 09/27/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024