Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations


Oklahoma Bankers Association


September 9, 2004

Mr. Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429

Re: RIN Number 3064-AC50 – FDIC Proposed Increase in the Threshold for the Small Bank CRA Streamlined Exam

Dear Mr. Feldman:

I’m writing on behalf of the Oklahoma Bankers Association in strong support for the FDIC’s proposal to increase the threshold for the streamlined small bank CRA examination to $1 Billion, without regard to the size of the bank’s holding company. Our Association represents all but four of Oklahoma’s 268 commercial banks, and even though this proposal would only have a direct impact on 14 member banks, we think it’s something that’s needed, both in Oklahoma and across the nation.

In spite of what some consumer groups and some politicians are claiming, this proposal does not remove or exempt banks below $1 Billion from their CRA requirements. It just addresses the exorbitant costs that smaller banks face in trying to live up to the same standards for CRA purposes that are imposed on trillion dollar banks. It makes no sense to apply trillion-dollar bank standards – for CRA or any other purposes for that matter – to small, community banks.

Our Association joins with the American Bankers Association in supporting the addition of a community development criterion to the small bank examination for larger community banks. However, we believe the FDIC should adopt its original $500 Million threshold without a Community Development (CD) criterion.

The new CD criterion should be applied only to banks greater than $500 Million up to $1 Billion. In our state that’s six banks. Community banks up to $500 Million now hold about the same percent of overall industry assets as community banks up to $250 Million did a decade ago when the revised CRA regulations were adopted, so this adjustment in the CRA threshold is appropriate.

As FDIC examiners know, it’s been difficult for small banks, especially those in rural areas, to find appropriate CRA qualified investments in their communities. Many small banks have had to make regional or statewide investments that are extremely unlikely to ever benefit the banks’ own communities or its own customers, and – to say it as plainly as I can – this is nuts. This certainly was not intended by Congress when it enacted the Community Reinvestment Act so many years ago.

Importantly, we strongly oppose making the CD criterion a test that’s separate from the bank’s overall CRA evaluation. Such differentiation creates the impression that CD lending is different from providing credit to the entire community. The current small bank test considers the institution’s overall lending in its community, as it should. The addition of a category of CD lending (and services to aid lending and investments as a substitute for lending) fits well within the concept of serving the whole community. A separate test would create an additional CD obligation and regulatory burden, eroding what we believe to be the intent of the streamlined exam.

Finally, we strongly support the FDIC’s proposal that would change the definition of “community development” to include rural residents and not just focus on low- and moderate-income area residents. This change will go a long way toward eliminating distortions in the current regulations that result in a small rural bank being told to invest in regional affordable housing bonds for an urban area not in the bank’s community.

Sincerely,

Doug Tippens, Chairman
Oklahoma Bankers Association

 

Last Updated 09/10/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024