| FIRST BANK AND TRUST CO. From: Shannon Contreras [mailto:SContreras@1stbanknet.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:26 AM
 To: Comments
 Subject: Community Reinvestment -- RIN 3064-AC50
 I am writing in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking 
        relating to the CRA that would change the definition of small bank by 
        raising the asset size threshold to $1 billion; add a community 
        development activity criterion to the evaluation method for small banks 
        with assets between $250 million and up to $1 billion; and expand the 
        definition of community development to include a broader range of 
        activities in rural areas.  Our institution has $267 million in total assets as of December 31, 
        2003. We reached $250 million in total assets in September of 2001 
        therefore, under current definitions, we are now a CRA “large 
        institution”. Our main office is in Duncan, Oklahoma and we have several 
        other banking centers in Ardmore, Healdton, and Norman, Oklahoma as 
        well.  I am pleased that FDIC is entertaining an increase of $1 billion 
        rather than $500 million. In my comment letter earlier this year 
        regarding the initial NPR I requested that you consider the $1 billion 
        increase as we are surrounded by larger statewide banks all with over $1 
        billion in total assets in all of our markets. I am very much in support 
        of this threshold increase and would welcome the decrease in the burden 
        of data collection and reporting of our CRA loans. However, another 
        aspect of the current large bank examination that includes credit for 
        qualified investments and loans was a big concern for banks such as 
        ourselves who fall between the $250 million and $1 billion asset size. I 
        feel that the community development criterion being added to the now 
        streamlined small bank examination will remain to put banks caught in 
        this asset size on an uneven playing field when trying to compete with 
        banks that have assets in excess of the $1 billion mark. Regulatory 
        burden relief is one concern but uneven competition for community 
        development credit is another concern that does not appear to be 
        addressed in this NPR. I would encourage the FDIC to consider this more 
        fully.  Expanding the definition of community development to encompass a 
        broader range of activities in rural areas could be of benefit to our 
        particular institution as we are in Southwestern Oklahoma and without 
        having to submit small farm lending on a loan register, assuming that a 
        $1 billion threshold increase is passed, we might gain some community 
        development loan credit in this area. Which brings me to the point that 
        although many community groups feel that this NPR is relaxing the CRA 
        and will eventually cause many banks to fail the community in terms of 
        meeting credit needs, this will actually allow our institution to funnel 
        the same loans and investments that we are making anyway into an actual 
        community development purpose rather than merely a line item on a loan 
        register.  When weighing the concerns of community groups that feel that 
        loosening the large bank CRA burden will cause banks to pull out of 
        community projects you must look past that and on to the credit unions, 
        financial centers, insurance companies, and even the housing developers 
        (many of whom incorporate their own financing methods) that do not have 
        to comply with the CRA. If there are going to be abusive lending 
        situations it is going to be through these organizations who are 
        aggressively seeking our traditional financial institution customers and 
        when these consumers find that they do not have many of these federal 
        banking regulations to protect them they will become vocal to the 
        community groups. Therefore, if the community groups have issues 
        trusting the banking industry then they need to be very suspicious of 
        the credit unions, et al.  Our financial institution has received three previous “outstanding” 
        CRA ratings under the current small bank exam method and we are 
        preparing for our first large bank examination. We have always had a 
        strong commitment to fulfill the requirements of the CRA and our asset 
        size will not change that. Regardless of the result of this NPR, we will 
        continue to provide services, loans, investments, and assistance 
        throughout our assessment areas, provide innovative and flexible credit 
        programs, and give back to all of our communities.  Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this NPR.  Sincerely,  Shannon Contreras CRA Administrator
 First Bank and Trust Co.
 P.O. Box 580
 Duncan, OK 73534
 |