| From: Sarah Brennan [mailto:sarahcbrennan@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 11:15 AM
 To: Comments
 Cc: ssiddiqi@ncrc.org
 Subject: RIN 3064-AC50, Community Reinvestment
 Mr. Robert E. FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th St. NW 20429
 RE: RIN 3064-AC50
 Dear Mr. Feldman:
         I am a concerned citizen writing to express my opposition to your 
        proposed changes to Community Reinvestment Act requirements for 
        mid-sized banks. CRA is integral for increasing homeownership and 
        advancing economic development in low and moderate income communities. 
        However, your proposed changes will halt the progress that has been 
        made.
         I understand that banks with over $250 million in assets must be 
        tested on their number of loans, investments, and services to low- and 
        moderate-income communities. But your proposal would eliminate the 
        investment and service requirements for all banks with under $1 billion 
        in assets. This will result in significantly fewer loans and investments 
        in affordable rental housing, health clinics, community centers, and 
        economic development projects.
         In this watered-down exam, you would allow mid-sized banks to choose 
        which community development activities they will undertake. Right now, 
        these banks must make community development loans, investments, and 
        services. Your proposed test allows banks to choose only one of the 
        three activities. The result will be less community development 
        activity.
         You also propose that community development activities in rural areas 
        should benefit any group of individuals instead of only low- and 
        moderate-income individuals. But this will allow banks to cherry-pick 
        and focus on affluent residents of rural areas rather than the lower 
        income consumers CRA targets. Finally, you would also eliminate publicly 
        available data on the small business lending of mid-sized banks. Without 
        data, community groups and citizens cannot hold banks accountable for 
        lending to small businesses in their neighborhoods.
         Your changes directly oppose CRA’s mandate to require lenders to meet 
        community needs. CRA is too important to be gutted. Please drop your 
        proposal like the two other federal agencies that recognized its harm to 
        underserved communities. 
         Sincerely,  Sarah Brennan38 Kings Highway North
 Westport, CT 06880-3001
 Cc: National Community Reinvestment Coalition |