| Heritage Bank
 September 17,
            2004
             Robert E. Feldman, Executive SecretaryFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street N.W.
 Washington DC 20429
 RE: CRA COMMENT LETTER (RIN Number 3064-AC50) Dear Sir: Heritage Bank
              supports the CRA Proposed Rule dated 8/20/04, along with community
              bankers
              across the nation. The new proposal is very
            much “on target” to reduce regulatory burden and make
            better use of the limited resources of banks in the $1 billion and
            less size range. Banks up to $1
              billion in assets are very much still “small
            banks” in today’s banking environment and the rules need
            to evolve to reflect that fact. The big are getting bigger, the small
            independent banks are disappearing, and those of us who are left
            in the middle will survive. It is not reasonable to subject a Wells
            Fargo-size institution and a $250-999 million asset-size institution
            to the same requirements.  Why? First, the
              requirements are unwarranted. As a community bank, we continually
              seek out credit
              opportunities. If we didn’t,
            we wouldn’t exist. Second, the large bank CRA rules, especially
            those related to reporting requirements, are too burdensome for even
            banks in the $250-999 million size range to comply with, as our technology
            cannot accomplish this reporting. In rural areas such as where Heritage
            Bank operates, measuring where loans are originated, size of borrowers,
            etc. is all rather a moot point. The result of the current CRA regulations? Increased overhead cost
            thus increased cost of credit to the communities we all serve; more
            bank time spent reporting, less time spent lending, developing and
            educating our communities. That is clearly counterproductive, and
            the proposed CRA rule will improve this situation greatly. I would further
              encourage the agencies to act expeditiously on this legislation,
              since reporting
              requirements begin and end on a calendar-year
            basis. From a practical standpoint, we need relief ASAP so that preparations
            aren’t made (i.e. resources wasted) to comply with the current
            CRA rules for the 2005 calendar year. Thank you for your consideration of these comments in support of
            the proposed rule. Sincerely, Sara Arnett, Compliance OfficerHeritage Bank
 Wood River, NE
 
             |