|             Godbold
              Financial Associates
 
 July 19, 2004
 Re:	Comments InteragencyGuidelines on Overdraft Protection Programs
 Volume 69, #109 of the Federal Register - June 7, 2004
  I am pleased to respond in behalf of the Overdraft Protection Program,
            Godbold Financial Associates of which I am president is affiliated
            with Impact Financial Services of Little Rock, Arkansas. Godbold
            Financial has been selling and implementing the Overdraft Privilege
            in South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Maryland,
            and Delaware for the past 4 years. We currently represent 77 banks
            in these areas.  My background
              in banking began in 1963 with C&S Bank of South
            Carolina and continued through until I retired in 1998 which included
            President of Bank of Gaffney, Gaffney, South Carolina, President
            of Lincoln Bank in Lincolnton, North Carolina, and President of Carolina
            State Bank in Shelby, North Carolina. I was involved in the initial
            development of Lincoln Bank and Carolina State Bank, which were denovo
            banks.  My experience in community banking has helped me relate to the financial
            institution that we represent and more particular to their customers.
            The Overdraft Privilege has proven to be very good and safe for financial
            institution. The customer needs and appreciates the product. The
            customer feels like the financial institution trusts them for the
            small limit provided and appreciates the financial institution for
            proving the safety net to avoid returned checks, additional costs,
            and embarrassment of having to pick up returned checks. This is one
            of the best retail products that I have seen in my years of banking.
            Win for the financial institution - Win for the customer.  COMMENTS: CHARGE OFF IN 30 DAYS Charging off
              in 30 days is too fast. It is my strong recommendation that charge
              off should
              be at 60 days. Sixty days will only increase
            the risk to the financial institution slightly. Impact’s collection
            process starts at 30 days therefore a customer has not received a
            collection letter until this time. The customer must be given time
            to respond to the 30 day letter. Upon receipt of this letter a large
            number of customers will clear their account with a deposit or they
            will request to be placed on a repayment plan. By charging off
              in 30 days the financial institution will have to cancel ATM/Debit
              Card, notify Chexsystems, etc. When the customer
            clears there account (which happens frequently) the financial institution
            must reverse the steps they took at charge off. This is bulky for
            the financial institution and bad for the customer. 60 DAYS to charge
            off will eliminate a tremendous amount of extra work for the financial
            institution. To counter the
              risk the financial institutions should set up a reserve specifically
            for the Overdraft Privilege and Repayment Plans, using actual experience
            to determine the amount.  The 60 days along with the reserve should be sufficient and it will
            save the financial institution a tremendous amount of time and money.
            Not to mention the inconvenience to the customer to reopen their
            checking account and replace their ATM/Debit cards.  UNUSED COMMITMENT REPORTING It is my opinion an unused commitment report serves no purpose.
            It will make it appear that the risk is much greater than it really
            is. Using a reserve account should satisfy the fears of the general
            public and the regulators. FREE ACCOUNT DISCLOSURES I do not believe marketing free checking with the Overdraft Privilege
            is misleading when adequate disclaimers are made and given. This
            is no different from a financial institution marketing free checking
            and requiring a direct deposit to get the free account. Adequate
            disclaimer is the answer.  NOTICES UPON FIRST AND SUBSEQUENT OVERDRAFTS I suggest that this section be deleted. All of the financial institution
            we are responsible for their Overdraft Privilege (77 banks) use their
            main processing system to provide the notices when checks have been
            paid in an overdraft status, this allows the customer to know that
            they are overdrawn and how much. To modify this notice specifically
            for the Overdraft Privilege could be very expensive and in most cases
            the operating system will not allow multiple types of notices plus
            many are limited to the number of characters that can be put on the
            notices. This would be a requirement that most community financial
            institution would not be able to meet. REPAYMENT PLANS It has been our experience when a customer signs up on a formalized
            basis for a repayment plan 80% will pay it off as agreed. To charge
            this off in 30 days requires the financial institution to close the
            account for the customer when most customers need a checking account.
            One of the major purposes of the repayment plan is to allow the customer
            to retain their account while drafts are being made against the account.
            To charge off the account in 30 days is not in the best interest
            of the customer since 80% of these customers would retain their account
            with the financial institution in good standing. Most checking account
            customers are good people that want to pay the financial institution. CONCLUSIONS I am pleased
              that the regulators are coming together to form guidelines that
              will be
              good for the financial institutions and their customers.
            The Overdraft Privilege product has proven to be good for the financial
            institution and the customer. We have just gone through a lengthy
            recession and the Overdraft Privilege program held up well. The Overdraft
            Privilege actually performed better during the recession since the
            financial institution customers needed the Overdraft Privilege more
            and the financial institution experience only a slight increase in
            charge offs. The Overdraft Privilege appears to be a minor safety
            and soundness issue since this is such a small part of the financial
            institution’s overall risk and reserves would balance the risk. Another issue that was not in the potential guidelines is the use
            of the Overdraft Privilege at the ATM and Point of Sale. Electronic
            banking is becoming a major way of banking for the customer. It is
            important that the customer be able to access their account for the
            Overdraft Privilege at the ATM and Point of Sale. We do support not
            showing the Overdraft Privilege limit in the available balance at
            the ATMs. This can be misleading to customers.  John J. GodboldPresident
 Godbold Financial Associates
 (affiliate of IMPACT Financial Services)
 PO Box 37540
 Rock Hill, SC 29732
 
 
 
 |