| NEIGHBORHOOD LENDING PARTNERS, INC. 
 From: Graves, Mary [mailto:mgraves@nlp-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:00 AM
 To: Comments
 Subject: Community Reinvestment -- RIN 3064-AC50
 Neighborhood Lending Partners, Inc. is a partnership between banks, 
        thrifts, local governments, and the affordable housing community. Our 
        members are banks, and thrift institutions throughout the state of 
        Florida. Membership in NLP gives these institutions a way to support 
        affordable housing while sharing the costs and risks. Our members are 
        comprised of 97 insured depository institutions. Since 1992, NLP has 
        provided more than $163 million in funds for building and/or for 
        rehabilitating more than 7800 units of affordable housing. Membership in 
        NLP also enhances institutions’ ability to meet community credit needs, 
        in accordance with the Community Reinvestment Act.  NLP, like many other successful, nonprofit providers of affordable 
        housing throughout the country, relies on our bank partners as sources 
        of private capital to leverage limited federal subsidies. The Community 
        Reinvestment Act encourages local institutions to assist in the creation 
        and expansion of small business, and the revitalization of 
        neighborhoods, and rural areas previously considered unbankable. The CRA 
        is vital to achieving investment in these underserved areas.  We understand that the FDIC shortly will consider a proposed rule 
        change by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) to increase the asset 
        threshold for the CRA small bank exam from $250 million to $1 billion. 
        We believe this proposal could have negative consequences for hundreds 
        of communities, including many in rural areas, and we urge you not to 
        adopt it.  While we understand that the OTS ruling is intended to help reduce 
        the regulatory burden for small banks, no studies have been conducted on 
        the potential benefits – or harm- of such a change. There is 
        considerable evidence to believe that proposal could have severe, 
        unintended consequences for the flow of much needed private capital and 
        services to LMI communities.  If the FDIC adopts the OTS’ proposal, 2000 fewer insured 
        institutions, with assets of nearly $1 trillion, would have far less 
        impetus to provide investments and services in low- and moderate-income 
        communities – and an estimated $5 billion that would have been 
        available, under the current rules, for affordable housing and community 
        development over the next few years would be lost. Because institutions 
        with assets between $250 million and $1 billion comprise a substantial 
        market share in rural areas, the proposed change also means that in some 
        states and many communities there will no longer have any insured 
        institutions with a CRA impetus to invest in affordable housing, tax 
        credits, and even financial literacy training.  As Federal resources for affordable housing and community development 
        continue to dwindle, our nation’s poorest communities can ill-afford to 
        lose billions of dollars in private investment and services. We urge 
        FDIC not to move forward with OTS’ proposal, and we urge all 4 bank 
        regulatory agencies to continue to consider rule changes that update CRA 
        for the communities the Act is intended to serve.  Sincerely,  Debra S. Reyes CEO
 
 |