Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

HERITAGE BANK OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS

September 15, 2004

Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
FDIC
550 17th St., NW
Washington, DC 20429

Delivered Via E-mail

Re: Community Reinvestment, RIN number 3064-AC50;
Proposal to Expand Eligibility for the Streamlined CRA Exam

Dear Mr. Feldman:

I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of Heritage Bank of Central Illinois, a $275 million, independent community bank based in rural Peoria County. We currently hold an “Outstanding” CRA rating which was just issued in May of this year. This is the third “Outstanding” rating we have received.

Due to our recent growth, we will become a “Large Bank” at the end of this year if the definition of “Small Bank” is not changed. Therefore, we are very pleased at the FDIC’s new proposal to increase the asset threshold to $1 billion and have no problem with the addition of a “community development” standard for banks $250 million to $1 billion. When our bank received its “Outstanding” rating under the current rules in 1998 we were a $75 million bank. Although we have grown to the size we are today, in no way, shape, or form are we a “Large Bank”, not in today’s world of muti-state and trillion dollar banks. We have just 5 offices and serve one county. What possible relevance is there in subjecting a bank like us to the same tests as Bank of America, Bank One, Wells Fargo, or even National City Bank. If we didn’t reinvest in our community, and provide outstanding service, these banks would eat our lunch with their larger array of products and services. I do not understand the rationale that some groups who oppose this proposal have. Why in the world would a bank stop serving its local community just because it is being examined under the “small bank” rules versus the ”large bank” rules? This type of argument is ludicrous and I urge the FDIC to reject it. In fact, at the last CRA exam, our examiner told us that it would be virtually impossible for us to achieve an “Outstanding” rating under the “Large Bank” exam. Talk about a “disincentive” for continuing our CRA efforts. But, if more banks were eligible for the “Small Bank” exam, more banks might try for an “Outstanding” since it might actually be attainable, and wouldn’t that be a good thing?

If the rules are left unchanged, the burden of complying with the large bank requirements will cost our bank additional time and money that, quite frankly could be put to better use. Regulatory burden is already a weight that is getting tougher to carry every year with GLB, SOX, the PATRIOT ACT, etc. More and more of my staff’s time is being spent on compliance related issues when it should be focused on expanding and bettering the products and services we provide to our community.

Regarding adding “Community Development in Rural Areas” as a community development activity, we think it is wholly appropriate. Just drive around the state and look at the state of most of our small towns. They are drying up and blowing away. They are in dire need of community reinvestment. But, at our last CRA exam, we were told that the purchase of $400,000 in revenue bonds for our local rural water district and purchase of our local school bonds didn’t count in our CRA evaluation. If we don’t invest in Trivoli Water District Bonds and Farmington School Bonds, who will, and why shouldn’t we get credit for reinvesting in our community?

In summary, we strongly urge the FDIC to adopt its proposal as written.

Respectfully Submitted,

M. Scott Hedden
President

Last Updated 09/16/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024