| 
 From: Melissa Rudnick
 Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:08 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: CRA proposed change
 I am writing as a citizen who has first hand experience of the need
            for, and benefits of, the CRA.
 
 I am not aware of the history of the CRA or of the politics that
            are
 surrounding this effort to re-define the term "small bank, but
            I do know
 that after college, while living for a short time in Connecticut,
            I was
 shocked by some of the practices of the banks. We were able to successfully
 address our concerns and have the needs of the community met because
            of the
 guidelines that are in existence through the CRA.
 
 After Connecticut, I moved back to my home of Minnesota, where I
            have lived
 for over 20 years. I understand that if the proposed change passes,
 Minnesota would have four or fewer banks that are subject to participating
 in CRA guidelines. This is unacceptable.
 
 Equal opportunity is a key component of our democracy, and when the
 institutions that hold our nation's assests do not willingly participate
            in
 our democracy, we must create expectations, guidelines and opportunities
            to
 help these institutions participate in our democratic nation. The
            CRA is an
 important tool in upholding the principles of our nation: equal opportunity
 for all, regardless of age, race, income, geographic location etc.
 I strongly urge you to protect the CRA and to keep the definition
            of smalls banks as is.
 Thanks much,Melissa Rudnick
 3148 10th Avenue South
 Minneapolis, MN
 
 
                  |