| 
 National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors
 
 September 8, 2004
 
 Mr. Robert E. Feldman
 Executive Secretary
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 Re: Proposed Rule for Fair Credit Reporting Medical Information
            Regulations 
 To Whom It May Concern:
 About NASCUS  The National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors (NASCUS)
            is a professional association representing the forty-eight (48) state
            and territorial regulatory agencies that supervise the nation's 4,090
            state-chartered credit unions. NASCUS has been committed to enhancing
            state credit union supervision and advocating for a safe and sound
            state credit union system since its inception in 1965. NASCUS appreciates
            the opportunity to submit comments on the FACT Act and its implications
            to state-chartered credit unions.  NASCUS realizes the May 28, 2004 deadline for submitting comments
            concerning the Fair Credit Transaction Act of 2003 (FACT Act) has
            passed. However, at the request of the Federal Reserve, NASCUS submits
            this letter for your consideration.  Fair
                Credit Reporting Medical Information Regulations & State-Chartered
            Credit Unions  Section 411 of FACT Act contains provisions designed to protect
            a consumer's medical information from being used or furnished in
            connection with a credit report or shared with all but an affiliate
            organization. Section 411 of the FACT Act amended Fair Credit Reporting
            Act (FCRA) Sections 604 and 603, respectively.  As you know, the FACT Act created a process by which enumerated
            federal agencies could construct regulatory exceptions exempting
            financial institutions from the medical information prohibition.
            However, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has enumerated
            powers over state-chartered credit unions, was not included in those
            provisions and this negatively impacts state-chartered credit unions.  NASCUS does not believe Congress intended to exclude not only state-chartered
            credit unions, but other financial service providers under jurisdiction
            of the FTC. Certainly, there is no indication in the Congressional
            Record that this was the result of anything other than legislative
            oversight. NASCUS strongly urges the Federal Financial Institutions
            Examination Council (FFIEC) to act decisively to remedy this situation.
            If allowed to continue, this legislative oversight will have a detrimental
            impact of state-chartered credit unions and to millions of consumers
            who seek these financial services from state-chartered credit unions. 
 State-Chartered Credit Unions Not Granted Exception for Medical Information
 As stated earlier, the wording providing enumerated federal agencies
            the right to provide exemptions for medical information in the FACT
            Act was not provided to the FTC. Therefore, state-chartered credit
            unions were not granted the same exceptions as other financial institutions,
            including federally chartered credit unions regulated by the National
            Credit Union Administration (NCUA).  State-chartered credit unions provide the same financial services
            to consumers as federally chartered credit unions. In fact, the business
            and operations of state-chartered credit unions are substantially
            similar to federally chartered credit unions.  It makes no business sense to deny state-chartered credit unions
            exceptions that permit them to obtain or use medical information
            in connection with credit eligibility determinations where necessary
            and appropriate; the same exceptions are provided to federally chartered
            credit unions. The uses of medical information by state-chartered
            credit unions for credit eligibility determinations are no different
            from federally chartered credit unions. We believe both uses are
            consistent with the Congressional intent for granting the exception
            for medical information.  This inconsistency in applying the FACT Act creates an unequal playing
            field for state-chartered credit unions. In fact, state-chartered
            credit unions are prevented from performing the appropriate due diligence
            in their credit eligibility operations. This poses a risk to safety
            and soundness. In addition, as referenced above, consumers are negatively
            impacted.  Solution for State-Chartered Credit Unions  NASCUS respectfully requests the Federal Financial Institutions
            Examination Counsel (FFIEC) to grant the same exceptions to medical
            information provided to other financial institutions in the FACT
            Act. Congress intended these exemptions for financial institutions,
            including state-chartered credit unions. These exceptions are crucial
            to state-chartered credit union lending operations and potentially
            threaten safety and soundness if a state-chartered credit union cannot
            access information that would lead to solid credit eligibility determinations.  The exemptions for medical information provides for integrity in
            the lending practices for state-chartered credit unions. If you have
            any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please do
            not hesitate to call me directly. I may be reached at (703) 528-8688.  Sincerely, Mary Martha Fortney
 President and CEO
 
                |