| FIDELITY HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION 
        September 17, 2004  Mr. Robert E. FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/ Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 RE: RIN Number 3064-AC50: FDIC Proposed Increase in the Threshold for 
        the Small Bank CRA Streamlined Examination  Dear Sir or Madam:  I am President and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity Homestead 
        Association, located in New Orleans, Louisiana. My bank has $712 million 
        in assets. Fidelity is an OTS regulated institution and we are pleased 
        they have taken the initiative in increasing the threshold to $1 billion 
        in assets and we encourage the FDIC to follow suit. This would greatly 
        relieve the regulatory burden imposed on many small banks such as my own 
        under the current regulation, which are required to meet the standards 
        imposed on the nation’s largest $1 trillion banks. I understand that 
        this is not an exemption from CRA and that my bank would still have to 
        help meet the credit needs of its entire community and be evaluated by 
        my regulator. However, I believe that this would lower my current 
        regulatory burden significantly.  I also support the addition of a community development criterion to 
        the small bank examination for larger community banks. It appears to be 
        a significant improvement over the investment test. However, I urge the 
        FDIC to adopt its original $500 million threshold for small banks 
        without a CD criterion and only apply the new CD criterion to community 
        banks greater than $500 million up to $1 billion. Banks under $500 
        million now hold about the same percent of overall industry assets as 
        community banks under $250 million did a decade ago when the revised CRA 
        regulations were adopted, so this adjustment in the CRA threshold is 
        appropriate. As FDIC examiners know, it has proven extremely difficult 
        for small banks, especially those in rural areas, to find appropriate 
        CRA qualified investments in their communities. Many small banks have 
        had to make regional or statewide investments that are extremely 
        unlikely to ever benefit the banks’ own communities. That was certainly 
        not the intent of Congress when it enacted CRA.  An additional reason to support the FDIC’s CD criterion is that it 
        significantly reduces the current regulation’s “cliff effect.” Today, 
        when a small bank goes over $250 million, 
        it must completely reorganize its CRA program and begin a massive new 
        reporting, monitoring and investment program. If the FDIC adopts its 
        proposal, a state nonmember bank would move from the small bank 
        examination to an expanded but still streamlined small bank examination, 
        with the flexibility to mix Community Development loans, services and 
        investments to meet the new CD criterion. This would be far more 
        appropriate to the size of the bank, and far better than subjecting the 
        community bank to the same large bank examination that applies to $1 
        trillion banks. This more graduated transition to the large bank 
        examination is a significant improvement over the current regulation.
         I strongly oppose making the CD criterion a separate test from the 
        bank’s overall CRA evaluation. For a community bank, CD lending is not 
        significantly different from the provision of credit to the entire 
        community. The current small bank test considers the institution’s 
        overall lending in its community. The addition of a category of CD 
        lending (and services to aid lending and investments as a substitute for 
        lending) fits well within the concept of servicing the whole community. 
        A separate test would create an additional CD obligation and regulatory 
        burden that would erode the benefit of the streamlined exam.  In conclusion, I believe that the FDIC has proposed a major 
        improvement in the CRA regulations, one that much more closely aligns 
        the regulations with the Community Reinvestment Act itself, and I urge 
        the FDIC to adopt its proposal, with the recommendations above. I will 
        be happy to discuss these issues further with you, if that would be 
        helpful.  Sincerely,FIDELITY HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION
 Boyd R. Boudreaux
 President / CEO
 cc: Allain C. Andry, IIIChairman of the Board,
 Fidelity Homestead Association
 
 |