|  Great
              Midwest Bank SSB
 From:
              Thomas Kannenberg [mailto:br8@greatmidwestbank.com]
 Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 5:52 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: Community Reinvestment: RIN number 3064-AC50
 Thomas KannenbergCRA Officer
 Great Midwest Bank SSB
 505 W Brown Deer Rd
 Bayside, WI 53217
 September 20, 2004
 Robert E. Feldman Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 Dear Robert Feldman:
 As a community banker, I am pleased to comment in support of the
            proposal issued by the FDIC that would amend the definition of a small institution
 to be a bank that is under $1 billion in assets. I believe that this
 change will provide much needed regulatory burden relief for me and
            other
 community bankers. It seems that every week there is a new or additional
 regulation with which we must comply. This is one example of regulatory
 burden relief that will really make a difference. I would much rather
            use
 the limited resources available to my bank to serve my community
            than to
 collect and maintain data and documents to prove to examiners that
            I am
 meeting the needs of my community.
 [please include something about your institution, its size, the
            area it serves, number of employees]
 Compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act is something we take
            very seriously at our bank. We don’t just believe it is the right
            thing to do;
 we believe it is the right business thing to do. No community bank
            can
 survive and compete without meeting the needs of its customers and
 communities. We believe in our community and in our customers and
            want to
 work with them to provide products and services that best meet their
 credit needs. We do not need a complicated examination process to
            show
 that we are complying with the law.
 It is absurd to think that a bank thousands of times larger than
            my own community bank should be examined using the same procedures. I strongly
 urge you to amend the definition of a small bank for CRA purposes
            to be an
 institution with less than $1 billion in assets, regardless of whether
            the
 bank is part of a holding company. This is a good proposal and is
            the
 right thing to do.
 Thank you for considering my views. Sincerely,             Thomas W. Kannenberg414-352-3710
 CRA Officer
 Great Midwest Bank SSB
 
   |