| UNITED STATES CONFERENCE 
        OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS September 16, 2004 Mr. Robert E. FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th St. NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 RE: RlN 3064-AC50  Dear Mr. Feldman:  On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I urge 
        that you withdraw the proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act 
        (CRA) regulations. The Bishops' Conference has strongly supported the 
        disclosure of lending patterns since legislation was first introduced in 
        1975. The Catholic Church—with parishes and agencies across the 
        nation—believes that people  must be permitted access to information 
        about the lending practices and patterns of the financial institutions 
        in their communities that seek their business. CRA has been an 
        effective financial vehicle for rural and urban communities for 
        decades. Low and moderate income families of all races and ethnicities 
        have benefited from CRA with increased opportunities to purchase homes, 
        open small businesses, or operate farms. The success of local 
        communities gaining access to private capital should not be jeopardized. 
        The proposed changes will dramatically reduce the ability of communities 
        to monitor and promote community reinvestment.  Currently, banks with  assets of at least $250 million are rated by 
        performance evaluations that scrutinize their level of lending, 
        investing, and services: within low- and moderate-income communities. 
        The proposed changes would substitute a less challenging criterion of 
        community development for state-charted banks with assets between $250 
        million and $1 billion. This proposal would allow mid-size banks to 
        choose a loosely defined "community development activity" rather than 
        the current requirement of providing comprehensive community development 
        activities needed by low- and moderate-income communities.  Many believe, and we fear, that the proposed community development 
        criterion could result in fewer loans and a significant reduction in 
        affordable rental housing investments. Community service facilities and 
        economic development projects would falter from lack of financial 
        support, as mid-size banks no longer maintain or build branches in low- 
        and moderate-income communities. Families in these communities would 
        lose access to affordable banking services.
         People in rural communities especially would be disadvantaged by the 
        new regulations that propose to consider any kind of community 
        development activities in rural areas as meeting CRA requirement 
        regardless of whether they focus on low- and moderate-income individuals 
        or not. This would allow banks to focus on affluent residents of rural 
        areas, diverting community development activities away from the low- and 
        moderate-income communities and consumers that CRA is designed to help.
         I urge you to withdraw and reconsider how best to strengthen—not 
        weaken—CRA's affirmative obligation of banks to meet credit needs. We 
        seek to expand and enlarge community reinvestment. The regulations, as 
        proposed, are likely to result in a significant reduction in the level 
        of community reinvestment. Sincerely  John L. Carr, SecretaryDepartment of Social Development and World Peace
 United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
 3211 Fourth St., NE
 Washington, DC 20017
 |