| NORTHWEST GEORGIA BANK 
        Mr. Robert E. Feldman Executive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 
        Re: RIN Number 3064-AC50: FDIC Proposed Increase in the Threshold for 
        the Small Bank CRA Streamlined Examination
         Dear Sir or Madam:
         I am the Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Georgia Bank, 
        headquartered in Ringgold, Georgia, a small town of 2,500 residents. 
        Ringgold is located in Catoosa County, which has a total population of 
        53,000. The Bank has been subject to the large bank CRA exam since 1999 
        and currently has an asset size of $459 million.  I am writing to strongly support the FDIC's proposal to raise the 
        threshold for the streamlined small bank CRA examination to $1 billion 
        without regard to the size of the bank's holding company. This would 
        greatly relieve the regulatory burden imposed on many small banks such 
        as Northwest Georgia Bank under the current regulation, which are 
        required to meet the standards imposed on the nation's largest $1 
        trillion banks. I understand that this is not an exemption from CRA and 
        that the Bank would still be required to help meet the credit needs of 
        its entire community and be evaluated by the Bank’s regulator. Further, 
        the 100 years of success of Northwest Georgia Bank is due in great part 
        to the contributions, both monetary and non-monetary, it has made to the 
        community. The Board of Directors, management and staff do not view it 
        just as a requirement of the CRA but as a responsibility and privilege. 
        However, I believe that raising the threshold would lower the Bank’s 
        current regulatory burden by countless man-hours and immeasurable costs. 
        Over 500 hours are spent each year training personnel, collecting and 
        maintaining the required data, and verifying the validity of the data 
        prior to transmission, at a minimum cost of over $20,000.00. 
        Additionally, many hours are spent each year seeking qualified 
        investments that would benefit our community. The investments 
        recommended by regulators during a recent exam would benefit a much 
        larger area than the Bank’s current assessment area. I do not feel that 
        it was the intent of Congress when CRA was enacted to require small 
        community banks to assist in the development of communities outside 
        their own community.
         I also support the addition of a community development (CD) criterion 
        to the small bank examination for larger community banks. It appears to 
        be a significant improvement over the investment test. However, I urge 
        the FDIC to adopt its original $500 million threshold for small banks 
        without a CD criterion and only apply the new CD criterion to community 
        banks greater than $500 million up to $1 billion. Banks under $500 
        million now hold about the same percent of overall industry assets as 
        community banks under $250 million did a decade ago when the revised CRA 
        regulations were adopted, so this adjustment in the CRA threshold is 
        appropriate. As FDIC examiners know, it has proven extremely difficult 
        for small banks, especially those in rural areas, to find 
        appropriate CRA qualified investments in their communities. Many small 
        banks have had to make regional or statewide investments that are 
        extremely unlikely to ever benefit the banks' own communities. That was 
        certainly not the intent of Congress when it enacted CRA. Northwest 
        Georgia Bank has diligently sought out qualified investments that would 
        benefit low- and moderate-income areas within the Bank’s assessment 
        area. However, it is worth noting that there are no low- or 
        moderate-income census tracts in Catoosa County. Further, there are no 
        low-income census tracts and only three moderate-income census tracts in 
        the Bank’s entire assessment area. In an effort to benefit low- and 
        moderate-income citizens within the Bank’s area, qualified investments 
        in the past have consisted of the purchase of county revenue bonds. 
        These investments, of course, are considered on a pro rata basis to the 
        population of low- and moderate-income families in the county. 
        Therefore, the Bank does not receive 100 percent recognition for this 
        type of investment.
         I strongly oppose making the CD criterion a separate test from the 
        bank's overall CRA evaluation. For a community bank, CD lending is not 
        significantly different from the provision of credit to the entire 
        community. The current small bank test considers the institution's 
        overall lending in its community. The addition of a category of CD 
        lending (and services to aid lending and investments as a substitute for 
        lending) fits well within the concept of serving the whole community. A 
        separate test would create an additional CD obligation and regulatory 
        burden that would erode the benefit of the streamlined exam. 
         I strongly support the FDIC's proposal to change the definition of 
        "community development" from only focusing on low- and moderate-income 
        area residents to including rural residents. I think that this change in 
        the definition will go a long way toward eliminating the current 
        distortions in the regulation. We caution the FDIC to provide a 
        definition of "rural" that will not be subject to misuse to favor just 
        affluent residents of rural areas. Northwest Georgia Bank operates a 
        full-service branch and several ATMs in rural areas within the Bank’s 
        assessment area. However, none of the locations are low- or 
        moderate-income census tracts. As already stated, there are no 
        low-income census tracts and only three moderate-income census tracts 
        within the Bank’s entire assessment area. The intent of providing these 
        services in rural locations is to meet the needs of the entire 
        assessment area through convenient access to products and services. A 
        change in the definition of “community development” to include rural 
        residents would more accurately define the Bank’s record of helping to 
        meet the needs of the entire assessment area. 
         In conclusion, I believe that the FDIC has proposed a major 
        improvement in the CRA regulations, one that much more closely aligns 
        the regulations with the Community Reinvestment Act itself, and I urge 
        the FDIC to adopt its proposal, with the recommendations above. I will 
        be happy to discuss these issues further with you, if that would be 
        helpful.
         Sincerely,L. Wesley Smith
 Chief Executive Officer
 Northwest Georgia Bank
 Ringgold, Georgia
 |