| September  2004 Mr.
            Robert E. Feldman Executive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit
            Insurance Corporation
 550 17th St. NW
 Washington, DC  20429
 
            RE: RIN 3064-AC50  Dear Mr. Feldman:  I am a concerned citizen opposed to watering down CRA (Community
            Reinvestment Act) requirements for mid-sized banks. CRA is vital
            for increasing homeownership and economic development in lower-income
            communities. However, your proposed changes will halt the progress
            that has been made.  I understand that banks with over $250 million in assets must be
            tested on their number of loans, investments, and services to low-
            and moderate-income communities. But your proposal would eliminate
            the investment and service requirements for all banks with under
            $1 billion in assets. This will result in significantly fewer loans
            and investments in affordable rental housing, health clinics, community
            centers, and economic development projects.  In the watered-down
              exam, you would allow mid-sized banks to choose which community
              development activities they will undertake. Right
            now, these banks must make community development loans, investments,
            and services. Your proposed test allows banks to choose only one
            of the three activities. The result will be less community development
            activity. You also propose that community development activities in rural
            areas should benefit any group of individuals instead of only low-
            and moderate-income individuals. But this will allow banks to cherry
            pick and focus on affluent residents of rural areas rather than the
            lower income consumers CRA targets. Finally, you would also eliminate
            publicly available data on the small business lending of mid-sized
            banks. Without data, community groups and citizens cannot hold banks
            accountable for lending to small businesses in their neighborhoods. Your changes directly oppose CRA's mandate to require lenders to
            meet community needs. CRA is too important to be gutted. Please drop
            your proposal like the two other federal agencies that recognized
            its harm to underserved communities. Sincerely,
 |