| SOUTH SUBURBAN HOUSING CENTER September 24, 2004 
        Mr. Robert E. FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attn: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 RE: Community Reinvestment -- RIN 3064-AC50  Dear Mr. Feldman:  I am writing on behalf of the South Suburban Housing Center to oppose 
        the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) proposed changes to the 
        Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). If the FDIC adopts these changes, 
        community development activity in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods 
        and rural areas throughout our south Chicago metropolitan region and the 
        nation will be threatened.  The FDIC's decision is harmful for a number of reasons. First, the 
        FDIC is the primary regulator of many state chartered banks that 
        frequently fall between $250 million and $1 billion in assets. For 
        institutions active in Illinois in 2003, nearly 40 percent of assets 
        controlled by FDIC-regulated institutions were held by banks with assets 
        between $250 million and $1 billion. Additionally, the proposed changes 
        would dramatically affect the presence of FDIC-regulated institutions in 
        Illinois' LMI and rural communities. An analysis of 2003 banking offices 
        in Illinois urban areas indicates that increasing the asset size of 
        small banks to $1 billion would decrease the number of FDIC-regulated 
        banking offices in Illinois LMI census tracts operated by "large" banks 
        by 63 percent. Deposits in LMI branches held by "large" FDIC-regulated 
        banks would decline by 68 percent. FDIC-regulated branches controlling 
        neatly $3.4 billion in LMI deposits, or over. 10 percent of all LMI 
        deposits state-wide, would shift from "large" to "small" institution 
        status if the asset size of small banks were to increase to $1 billion. 
        Rural areas will be hard hit as well. Just over 1 percent of rural 
        Illinois banking offices operated by FDIC regulated institutions would 
        be held by "large" banks, a decline of 91.5 percent. This shift would 
        represent nearly 8 percent of rural deposits state-wide.  The proposed changes would reduce the number of financial 
        institutions considered "large" for CRA purposes. Our organization fears 
        this will threaten access to investments, grants, and services for low- 
        and moderate-income (LMI) communities served by large institutions that 
        would shift to "small" status under the regulators' proposal. There is a 
        significant concern that areas predominantly served by mid-sized 
        institutions will be particularly hard hit.  We oppose these changes to the Community Reinvestment Act and ask 
        that FDIC drop this proposal. Sincerely, John R. PetruszakExecutive Director
 South Suburban Housing Center
 Homewood, IL
 |