| Home Regulation & Examinations Laws & Regulations  FDIC Federal Register Citations | |||
| FDIC Federal Register Citations  Enterprise
	        Foundation Mr. Donald E. Powell        Re: RIN Number 3064-AC50  The Enterprise Foundation urges you to withdraw the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations. We believe the proposal would undermine the intent of the CRA by decreasing the regulatory incentives for mid-sized banks to make investments in and provide services for underserved communities. The proposal would also mistakenly shift the focus of community development away from activities that benefit low- and moderate-income individuals to activities that benefit any individuals who reside in rural areas, regardless of their income. Enterprise and its subsidiary organizations, primarily the Enterprise Social Investment Corporation, have invested more than $5 billion to support more than 160,000 affordable homes in low-income communities across the country. Many of our partners are depository institutions covered by the CRA. There is no federal policy more important to expanding housing and economic opportunity to low-income families and communities than the CRA.  The proposed revision
          would significantly increase the number of financial institutions subject
          to the small bank CRA examination. Because about
          96 percent of FDIC-regulated banks have assets of less than $1 billion,
          only about 41 institutions – about 4 percent of FDIC-regulated
          banks – would be subject to comprehensive CRA exams under the
          new proposal. If the proposal is implemented, it is estimated that
          eight states – Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, New
          Mexico, West Virginia and Wyoming – would have no FDIC-supervised
          banks subject to a full CRA review and 36 states would have five or
          fewer such banks. Mid-sized banks no longer subject to the complete
          CRA examination would have much less incentive to provide investments
          and services that benefit low- and moderate-income individuals, such
          as banking accounts and remittances.  
 
 | ||
| Last Updated 11/08/2004 | regs@fdic.gov | |
