| via email
 Illinois 
        Facilities Fund
 November 3, 2003
 Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive 
        Secretary Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20429
 Dear Mr. Feldman:  The Illinois Facilities Fund (IFF) is 
        submitting comments in response to the Advance Notice of Proposed 
        Rulemaking on the proposed Risk-Based Capital Rules, published on August 
        4, 2003.  As a statewide, nonprofit community 
        development financial institution (CDFI), the IFF provides real estate 
        loans, real estate planning and development, management education and 
        public policy to nonprofits throughout Illinois. Since 1989, the IFF has 
        made 260 loans totaling more than $65 million to help 183 Illinois 
        nonprofits such as child care centers, youth shelters and community 
        health clinics, to buy, expand, or renovate their facilities. The IFF 
        has also provided real estate services, including real estate 
        consulting, development, and project management services to over 45 
        nonprofit organizations.  As a federally certified CDFI, the IFF 
        works with nonprofits serving low-income and special needs populations. 
        IFF offers a wide range of programs which help build and maintain 
        financially sound nonprofits, revitalize communities, and bring services 
        to people in need. The IFF has a track record of helping to create or 
        maintain 6,600 jobs and developing over 3 million square footage of new 
        real estate in traditionally underserved markets.  The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) has 
        promoted investments by traditional financial institutions in CDFIs. For 
        instance, since the inception of the IFF, nine banks have invested in 
        our loan program, lending over $26 million at below market rates. With 
        these investments, CDFIs have the resources to specialize in providing 
        financial services and capital to individuals, small businesses, 
        religious or nonprofit community-based organizations in low-income or 
        economically under-invested markets. By focusing on underserved markets, 
        CDFIs fill financial gaps and stimulate economic revitalization by 
        offering services with rates and terms structured and products tailored 
        to meets the needs of their customers. In addition to financial 
        services, CDFIs provide extensive training and technical assistance 
        services for free or below market rates to ensure clients succeed.
         The IFF applauds regulators for 
        recognizing the vital role of Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) 
        investments in the U.S., and negotiating for a special rule for 
        “Legislated Program Equity Exposures.” This section wisely preserves the 
        current capital charge on most equity programs made under legislated 
        programs that involve government oversight. CRA-related investments are 
        generally held harmless under the proposed rule. The fact is CRA equity 
        investments may sometimes provide lower yields than other investments, 
        but they also have lower default rates and volatility of returns than 
        other equity investments. For example, the IFF’s default rate is less 
        than one percent.  However, the IFF is concerned that the 
        proposed rules will negatively affect the ability of the IFF, CDFIs and 
        other community and economic development organizations from receiving 
        investments under CRA. Specifically, the “materiality” test of the 
        proposed rules requires institutions that have, on average, more than 10 
        percent of their capital in equity investments, to set aside much higher 
        amounts of capital on their non-CRA investments. As drafted, this 
        calculation includes even CRA investments that are specifically excluded 
        from the new capital charges.  Having to include CRA investments, with 
        their very different risk/reward profile, in the “materiality” bucket of 
        more liquid, higher-yielding, more volatile equity exposures could have 
        an unintended effect on the flow of equity capital to communities in 
        need. CDFIs and their bank partners have invested substantially in 
        community economic development (for example, through Low Income Housing 
        Tax Credits (LIHTC) or New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC)) that currently 
        approach, or even exceed, the 10 percent threshold just from CRA-qualified 
        investments alone. If the materiality test is adopted as proposed, it 
        could discourage banks from making CRA investments to avoid triggering 
        the higher capital charges on non-CRA investments.  The IFF appreciates the opportunity to 
        comment on the New Basel Capital Accord and reiterate the importance of 
        CRA for our organization and other community development organizations 
        throughout the country. Thank you for your consideration.  Sincerely yours,  Elizabeth A. Evans Director of Public Policy and Communications
 Illinois Facilities Fund
 Chicago, IL
   |