| August 29, 2003 
 Mr. Robert E. Feldman
 Executive Secretary
 Attn: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 Re: FDIC Coverage for Living Trust Accounts  Dear Mr. Feldman:  We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed changes 
        regarding FDIC coverage for Living Trust Accounts.  As most everyone would agree, insurance for deposit accounts is very 
        complex and often difficult to understand, not only for customers, but 
        for many bank employees as well. Any steps that can be taken to simplify 
        the insurance rules would benefit all involved.  Alternative One that is proposed would continue to offer more 
        coverage, since it is based on coverage for each beneficiary rather than 
        each owner. However, it appears if this alternative is chosen, the 
        burden placed upon the banks would be significant in that we would be 
        required to review trust documents in detail to determine each 
        beneficiary’s ownership interest in the trust. Potential conflicts could 
        arise if beneficiary changes are subsequently made and the bank is not 
        notified of the change. Additionally, the bank would need to record the 
        information pertaining to beneficiary interest. Would there be a 
        standard format provided by FDIC? Or would banks need to make changes to 
        signature cards to record the beneficiary information? Regardless of the 
        method used, more burden would be placed on banks to record and update 
        beneficiary information for living trusts.  Alternative Two, if chosen, would not require banks to verify 
        beneficiary information. Additionally, if changes were made to the trust 
        agreement, the coverage would not be affected, since it is based on the 
        owner rather than the beneficiaries. However, the amount of coverage 
        under Alternative Two could be significantly less, resulting in 
        customers possibly separating high balance accounts between 
        institutions. Not only would this negatively impact the banks, it would 
        create additional paperwork for the customer to keep up with multiple 
        accounts for one trust.  If I had to choose between the two alternatives as proposed, I would 
        choose Alternative Two. However, because of the potential reduced 
        coverage, I would propose increasing the coverage amount under this 
        alternative.  Thank you again for allowing us to comment on this important change.
         Sincerely, Patty McClure
 Asst Vice President
 HomeTrust Bank
 Asheville, NC
   |