| August 27, 2003 Mr. Robert E. Feldman  Executive Secretary  Attention: Comments/Legal ESS Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 RE: RIN 3064-AC54 
 Dear Mr. Feldman:
 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rules 
        clarifying the regulations on insuring living trust accounts. We agree 
        that deposit insurance for living trust accounts is complicated.  We propose implementing Alternative Two when writing the final rule 
        for living trust accounts. Alternative One imposes a huge burden on the 
        bank if it is implemented. The bank would be required to maintain copies 
        of the Trust agreement, determine if each beneficiary is qualified and 
        their interest in the trust, and incorporate changes made to the trust. 
        Tracking the interest of each beneficiary would be complicated and 
        create an additional burden on the bank especially if the share of each 
        beneficiary is different. Each financial institution would have to 
        include the beneficiaries on their Customer Information File system 
        along with the amount each qualifying beneficiary would receive from the 
        trust. Calculating the uninsured portion of deposits for the quarterly 
        Call Report would be difficult without major programming changes to our 
        mainframe system.  Under Alternative Two, we understand that a trust may have a total 
        relationship greater than $100,000 resulting in no insurance coverage if 
        the amount is greater than $100,000. However, these rules are easier to 
        understand for both the customer and the bank employee explaining it. We 
        also agree that the depositor would be able to make an informed decision 
        in determining the maximum insurance coverage for their living trust 
        account.  The procedural requirements for Alternative Two would only require 
        the bank to document the existence of the trust, something that is 
        required through the Customer Information Program (CIP) that becomes 
        effective October 1, 2003. Also, if Alternative Two is approved, we 
        propose that customers be notified of the change and given a time period 
        such as six months to decide if they will leave the funds where they are 
        or reallocate them to improve their FDIC insurance coverage.  Thank you for considering these comments.
 Yours truly,
 
 1st SOURCE BANK
 Peggy Voorheis
 Consumer Compliance Officer
 South Bend, IN
 
 |