| Community Bank
 From: Cindy Bailey
 Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 5:25 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: RIN Number 3064-AC50
 August 24, 2004 FDIC
 RIN Number 3064-AC50 To whom it may Concern, As a community bank, we strongly endorse the new proposal
                  under theCommunity Reinvestment Act Regulation. Community Bank supports
                  the
 consideration of a range of other alternatives involving the
                  small bank
 asset threshold and the evaluation of community development
                  activities.
 
• Change the definition of “small bank” to
                      raise the asset size threshold to1 billion with no consideration of holding company ownership.
 • Add a community development activity criterion to the streamlined
 evaluation method for small banks with assets greater then
                      250 million up to
 1 billion.
 • 
                    Expand the definition of “community development” to
                      encompass a broader
 range of activities in rural areas.
 Changing
                    the asset size for a “small bank’ to
                  1 billion makes a tremendousamount of sense. The asset size of 250 million is considered
                  quite small in
 today’s environment of multi-million dollar institutions.
                  The change would
 help keep the focus of small institutions on lending and would
                  be entirely
 consistent with the purpose of CRA. Not to mention the fact
                  a large
 institution test requires qualified investments the small bank
                  might not be
 able to accomplish or not be able to compete in the investment
                  arena with
 multi-billion dollar institutions.
 Community development in rural areas should be assessed in
                  a different lightthen the urban areas. Community development activities in rural
                  areas may
 benefit low and moderate individuals as well as the rural community
                  as a
 whole. The activity should warrant consideration even if the
                  activity is
 not located in a low to moderate census tract.
 The proposed
                    criterion would assess an institution’s
                  record of helping tomeet the credit needs of its assessment area through a combination
                  of its
 community development lending, qualified investments, or community
 development services, one or two not all three, would permit
                  institutions to
 better balance the community development activities based on
                  the
 opportunities in the intuitions market area.
 In conclusion Community Bank supports the FDIC proposed changes
                  in theCommunity Reinvestment Act as stated above.
 Sincerely, Community BankJoseph, OR 97846
 Cindy Bailey
 AVP/Compliance and CRA Officer
 
                                                      
                              |