| From: Capps,
            Randy [mailto:RCapps@ui.urban.org]
 Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:08 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: Community Reinvestment - RIN 3064-AC50
 Mr. Robert E. FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th St. NW 20429
 RE: RIN 3064-AC50
 Dear Mr. Feldman: I am a concerned citizen opposed to watering down CRA (CommunityReinvestment Act) requirements for mid-sized banks. CRA is vital
              for
 increasing homeownership and economic development in lower-income
 communities. However, your proposed changes will halt the progress
            that has
 been made.
 I understand that banks with over $250 million in assets must be
            tested ontheir number of loans, investments, and services to low- and moderate-income
 communities. But your proposal would eliminate the investment and
            service
 requirements for all banks with under $1 billion in assets. This
            will result
 in significantly fewer loans and investments in affordable rental
            housing,
 health clinics, community centers, and economic development projects.
 In the watered-down exam, you would allow mid-sized banks to choose
            whichcommunity development activities they will undertake. Right now,
            these banks
 must make community development loans, investments, and services.
            Your
 proposed test allows banks to choose only one of the three activities.
            The
 result will be less community development activity.
 You also propose that community development activities in rural
            areas shouldbenefit any group of individuals instead of only low- and moderate-income
 individuals. But this will allow banks to cherry-pick and focus on
            affluent
 residents of rural areas rather than the lower income consumers CRA
            targets.
 Finally, you would also eliminate publicly available data on the
            small
 business lending of mid-sized banks. Without data, community groups
            and
 citizens cannot hold banks accountable for lending to small businesses
            in
 their neighborhoods.
 Your changes directly oppose CRA's mandate to require lenders to
            meetcommunity needs. CRA is too important to be gutted. Please drop your
 proposal like the two other federal agencies that recognized its
            harm to
 underserved communities.
 Sincerely, Randy CappsCabin John MD 20818
 
             |