Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

SOUTHWEST BANK

October 5, 2004

Public Information Room
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
250 E Street, SW
Mailstop 1-5
Washington, DC 20219
Fax: 202-874-4448
e-mail: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov

Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429
Website: http://www.fdic.gov/ e-mail: comments@fdic.gov

Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20551
Fax: 202-452-3819
e-mail: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov

Regulation Comments
Chief Counsel's Office
Office of Thrift Supervision
1700 G Street, NW
Washington, DC 20552
Fax: 202-906-6518
e-mail: regs.comments@ots.treas.gov

Re: Oxley’s Lead in Charge for Community Reinvestment Act Reform

Dear Sir or Madam:

I am extremely thankful to House Financial Services Committee Chairman Mike Oxley (R-OH) and the 20 other Republicans* who recently told FDIC Chairman Donald Powell, in a September 22, 2004 letter, that they support the agency’s proposed changes to CRA regulations that would raise the asset size limit for streamlined examinations to $1 billion. As stated in the letter, “The FDIC’s proposal will permit small institutions to focus their time and resources to the communities they serve rather than complying with burdensome regulatory requirements.”
Additionally, the letter went on to say “We would support the FDIC’s community development test as proposed so long as this test would provide banks with more flexibility to deal with CRA regulations in a cost-effective way while not imposing any new regulatory burdens and costs.”
As a community banker, I couldn’t agree more with the sentiments, statements and facts of these two very succinct statements! It would appear to me that these Members truly do understand the excessive cost and time constraints small community banks would disproportionately face if they were to be subjected to the same CRA requirements as the large multi-million dollar mega-banks.
The reporting and tracking requirements for large banks versus small banks are out of proportion in relation to the benefit to be gained. The decision to increase the threshold for small banks should be supported by all the Regulatory Agencies, and all members of the House, Senate and Congress as well.

*Additional thanks also go to: Richard Baker (LA), Spencer Bachus (AL), Robert Ney (OH), Ed Royce (CA), Ron Paul (TX), Paul Gillmor (OH), Jim Ryun (KS), Walter Jones (NC), Doug Ose (CA), Tom Feeney (FL), Jeb Hensarling (TX), Scott Garrett (NJ), Ginny Brown-Waite (FL), J. Gresham Barrett (SC), Shelly Moore Capito (WV), W. Todd Akin (MO), Jim Gerlach (PA), C. L “Butch” Otter (ID), Pete Sessions (TX) and Roscoe Bartlett (MD).

Thank you in advance for letting me share my thoughts with you on this topic.
Sincerely yours,

Bill Mansfield
Vice President \ Credit Administration

Last Updated 10/13/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024