Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations |
|||
FDIC Federal Register Citations |
Communications Division Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 250 E Street, S.W. Public Information Room Mailstop 1-5 Attention: 1557-0081 Washington, D.C. 20219 Jennifer J. Johnson Robert E. Feldman Citigroup appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions regarding subprime lending (the "proposal") to the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC"), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Board"), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"; together with the OCC and the Board, the "Agencies"). The proposal indicates that the Agencies will utilize the subprime lending data to better plan their examination of banks and to monitor changes in and performance of subprime lending programs at banking institutions. Citigroup suggests that a more effective approach to monitor subprime lending data for supervisory purposes would be to review the underwriting standards, other internal risk management controls, and the overall lending process at institutions. If however, the regulators decide to proceed with the proposed disclosures, our specific recommendations on the proposal are presented below. Definitions of Subprime Loans and Subprime Lending Program Citigroup is in agreement with both the materiality thresholds for detailed disclosures
and the proposal to limit the scope of reporting on subprime activity to programs rather
than individual loans. However, similar to our recommendations concerning the definition
of subprime, Citigroup recognizes the potential risks with inconsistent application of the
term "program" across institutions. Citigroup strongly agrees with the Agencies' proposal that the information in this schedule be accorded confidential treatment on an individual institution basis. The supervisory and examination, rather than statistical, focus of the data captured by the proposed schedule supports this treatment. Additionally, we concur that confidentiality should remain in effect until there is a standard industry-wide approach to the "subprime" or "program" definitions since failure to do so could result in misinterpretation of the data by the public. In addition to possible improper interpretation of the data, the failure to maintain confidential treatment will also result in placing banking institutions at a competitive disadvantage to those lending organizations not supervised by the banking regulators, and not subject to the required disclosures. Accordingly, Citigroup recommends that the proposed schedule be granted permanent confidential treatment, similar to what has been accorded for fiduciary and related services income as disclosed on schedule RC-T - Fiduciary and Related Services. Timing of Effectiveness and Implementation As the proposal states "there is no standard industry-wide approach to the definitions of either subprime loans or sub-prime lending programs, indicating that the meanings of these terms are institution specific. Until uniform definitions of subprime loans and subprime lending programs are developed, it would be difficult for banks to automate the collection of this type of data. Therefore, reporting institutions may need to manually gather the data, which will be operationally cumbersome. Accordingly Citigroup would recommend that the agencies allow sufficient lead-time ( not less than two reporting quarters)for implementation of any approved reporting changes. * * * We would be pleased to discuss these comments with you at your convenience. Sincerely, |
Last Updated 09/11/2002 | regs@fdic.gov |