| From: Bethany Porter Sanchez [mailto:clubbethany@hotmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 5:58 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: RIN 3064-AC50, Community Reinvestment
 
 RE: RIN 3064-AC50, Community Reinvestment  Dear Mr. Feldman:  I am writing as a concerned citizen to express my strong opposition 
        to the FDIC's proposal to significantly weaken the Community 
        Reinvestment Act (CRA).  Having worked for nonprofits involved in housing and community 
        development for over 25 years, and having worked with lenders trying to 
        meet their CRA requirements, I believe that the FDIC's proposal will 
        result in significantly fewer home loans and small business loans to low 
        and moderate income borrowers, and significantly fewer community 
        development loans and investments in low and moderate income 
        communities.  The impact of the proposed CRA changes would be huge. Nationally, 
        this proposed definition would would make 879 state-chartered banks with 
        over $392 billion in assets eligible for a streamlined and cursory CRA 
        exam. The impact on FDIC-regulated institutions in Wisconsin would be 
        that an additional 27 Wisconsin institutions' CRA commitments would be 
        reduced significantly. While this represents 12.5% of the FDIC-regulated 
        institutions in the state, their $10.35 billion in assets represent 
        35.88% of the of Wisconsin's FDIC institutions.  Looking at just the urban areas, an additional 22 urban-based 
        Wisconsin institutions' CRA commitments would be reduced significantly. 
        This represents 24.4% of the urban FDIC-regulated institutions in the 
        state and their $8.9 billion in assets represent 52.5% of the assets of 
        Wisconsin's FDIC-regulated institutions. Again, these numbers represent 
        the additional Wisconsin institutions and assets that would have 
        significantly reduced CRA requirements under this proposal.  In addition, the proposal would allow banks to earn CRA points by 
        financing community development projects that benefit affluent residents 
        in rural areas, instead of low and moderate income consumers and 
        communities in rural America. This is directly contrary to CRA’s focus 
        on meeting credit needs of low and moderate income communities.  In summary, these proposals will result in significantly fewer loans, 
        investments, and branches in low and moderate income communities. Please 
        withdraw this harmful proposal.  Sincerely,
         Bethany Sanchez2303 E. Belleview Place, #1
 Milwaukee, WI 53211
 
 |