Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

SUN WEST BANK

September 30, 2004

Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429
Comments@FDIC.gov

Re: Community Reinvestment, RIN number 3064-AC50;
Proposal to Expand Eligibility for the Streamlined CRA Exam

Dear Mr. Feldman:

My name is Jackie K. DeLaney, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sun West Bank, a community bank located in Las Vegas, Nevada. As a community banker, I join my fellow community bankers throughout the nation in strong support of the FDIC’s proposal to increase the asset size limit of banks eligible for the streamlined small-bank CRA examination. I am writing to support the FDIC’s proposal to raise the threshold for the streamlined small bank CRA examination to $1 billion without regard to the size of the bank’s holding company.

Sun West Bank recently went over the $250 million mark. This proposal will allow Sun West Bank to move from the small bank examination to an expanded but still streamlined small bank examination, with the flexibility to mix Community Development loans, services and investments to meet the new CD criterion. This would be far more appropriate than subjecting us to the same large bank examination that applies to banks as large as $1 trillion. This more graduated transition to the large bank examination is a significant improvement over the current regulation and means small banks will be more responsive to community needs and promote and support community and economic development.

The proposal will greatly alleviate unnecessary paperwork and examination burden without weakening our commitment to reinvest in our communities. Reinvesting in our communities is something we do everyday as a matter of good business. Making it less burdensome to undergo a CRA exam by expanding eligibility for the streamlined exam will not change the way my bank does business. In fact, it will free up human and financial resources that can be redirected to the community and used to make loans and provide other services.

It is important to remember that the streamlined CRA exam is not an exemption from CRA. It is a more cost effective and efficient CRA exam. Banks subject to the simplified CRA exam are still fully obligated to comply with CRA. Just as now, community banks would continue to be examined to ensure they lend to all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income individuals and neighborhoods. It just doesn’t make sense and is inequitable to evaluate a $250 million or even a $1 billion bank using the same exam procedures as for a $10 billion or $1 trillion bank.

One of the problems with the current large bank CRA exam is that the definition of “qualified investments” is too limited, and qualified investments can be difficult to find. As a result, many community banks (especially those in rural areas) have to invest in regional or statewide mortgage bonds or housing bonds and the like to meet CRA requirements. These investments may benefit other areas of the state or region, but they actually may take resources away from the bank’s local community. Community banks and communities would be better off if the banks could truly reinvest those dollars locally to support their own local economies and residents. For this reason, I find the FDIC’s proposed community development requirement for banks between $250 million and $1 billion more flexible and more appropriate than the large bank investment test. The advantage to this proposal is that it continues to focus on community development, but considers investments, lending and services. It would let community banks pursue community development activities that both meet the local community’s needs and make sense in light of the bank’s strategic strengths.

Similarly, the proposal will help rural banks meet the special needs of their communities by expanding the definition of “community development” so that it includes activities that benefit rural residents in addition to low- and moderate-income individuals. Rural banks are frequently called upon to support needed economic or infrastructure development such as school construction, revitalizing Main Street, or loans that help create needed or better-paying jobs. These activities should not be ineligible for CRA credit because they do not benefit only low- or moderate-income individuals.

The FDIC’s proposed changes to CRA are needed to help alleviate regulatory burden and are a major improvement in the CRA regulations allowing it to more closely align with the intent of the Act. Without changes such as this, more and more community banks like mine will find they cannot sustain independent existence because of the crushing regulatory burden, and will opt to sell out. For many small towns and rural communities, the loss of the local bank is a major blow to the local community. By easing regulatory burden, it will make it easier for community banks like Sun West Bank to continue to provide committed service to local communities that often few other financial service providers are willing to do.

Thank you for considering my views.

Sincerely,
Jackie K. DeLaney
President and Chief Executive Officer
Sun West Bank
5830 West Flamingo Road
Las Vegas, NV 89103

Last Updated 10/08/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024