|
Remarks by
Ricki Helfer
Chairman
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
before a
Community Development Lending Conference
sponsored by
The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
The American Bankers Association Center for Community Development
and the
U.S. Small Business Administration
Snowbird, Utah
August 6, 1996
A friend of mine who is also from Tennessee is fond of telling about
Private Telly Pappas, who, at the beginning of World War II, was
stationed outside the small town where my friend grew up. Private
Pappas was anxious to get married before going overseas, but he could not
get a furlough to go home to New York. His fiancee, however, was
perfectly willing to come to Tennessee -- but once she was there, a
difficulty arose. She was a devout young woman and insisted on being
married by a Greek Orthodox priest.
There lived no one of the Orthodox faith in the county where her
husband-to-be was stationed, much less an Orthodox priest. So they
wired Father Constantine Rozakis in New York, and he agreed to help
them with their problem.
Father Rozakis immediately took a train to Memphis, and then a
bus for the two-hour drive to the small town. When he got off the bus,
several youngsters in the area were struck speechless by his long, gray
beard; his shoulder-length gray hair; his long black coat; and his
conservative black hat -- a fedora with a wide brim. They followed him as
he walked through town, with other children joining the parade until the
poor priest thought he was leading a procession.
Finally, he turned around and asked: "What is the matter with you
kids? What do you find so fascinating?"
The largest boy in the crowd stepped forward and replied: "Sir, we
are sorry if we appear rude -- it's just that we don't get to see many
Yankees here."
We expect misconceptions to occur when people are strangers to
each other -- when they operate on the basis of hearsay and stereotypes,
rather than on their own experience. Unfortunately, people do not have to
live half-way across the country to be strangers to each other -- culture
and class and other intangible divisions make people strangers to each
other, too.
Three years ago, Robert Mooney, a community affairs officer in
the Chicago region of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was
asked by an association of women business owners to co-sponsor a
seminar for bankers on lending to members of the association and to other
women business owners. They wanted us to deliver the message that
banks needed to lend more. Bob Mooney looked at this request as an
opportunity to try out an idea.
These business owners wanted loans, but they needed more than
loans -- they needed the type of advice that bankers have long provided --
guidance on financial and business management -- in short, they needed
banking relationships. No one can coerce relationships, however -- they
have to be built on understanding and trust. Rather than lecturing
bankers to do more, the FDIC brought together a small group of bankers
and women business owners to talk about the specific obstacles -- on both
sides -- to developing banking relationships, and how they could be
overcome.
So rather than trying to solve the problems of the bankers and
entrepreneurs in the meeting, the FDIC -- and the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago, which co-sponsored the meeting -- provided them an
opportunity to overcome their problems on their own.
Some of the participants in the meeting may have come away with
new banking relationships -- but all came away with a greater
understanding of the people on the other side of the banking equation, an
understanding built on experience.
At the FDIC, our experience is that, if financial institutions become
involved in the community development process beyond just lending, if
they offer a range of banking services, the results are longer term and
better. Our Community Affairs Officer, Bob Mooney, believed that -- by
building understanding and trust on the basis of personal experience -- his
approach of bringing people together in small groups could promote
community development. He convinced his colleagues at the FDIC to give
it a try.
It seemed reasonable. His approach did not have the "glitz" of a
big, top-down governmental program. It did, however, have a number of
virtues, the greatest one being its flexibility: Community development is a
process, not an event -- a process that is constantly changing -- and it is
as varied as communities are themselves -- no single approach will work
everywhere.
Moreover, from the FDIC's perspective, this approach did not say
to the participants: "We are from the government and we are here to help
you." Rather, we said: "We are here to help you help yourselves."
That was consistent with our commitment to a partnership with
banks to help them identify and address community development needs.
In addition, it was a creative approach to promoting community
development outside the role of a regulator enforcing compliance with the
Community Reinvestment Act and laws against discrimination -- as
essential as that role is -- and outside our traditional outreach and
training efforts. It is positive for everyone involved: bankers, who can
find new markets and new customers; and community development
representatives and small business people, who will have the opportunity
to explore banking relationships and financing.
As facilitator of these meetings, we can also make discussions
easier.
Whatever stereotypes the participants brought with them --
community advocates as unreasonable militants; bankers as members of a
privileged profession interested only in catering to the establishment --
they would meet a reality more complex -- not so easily reduced to
stereotypes -- of community advocates who want to talk with bankers to
encourage benefits to the community, bankers who want to do business
wherever they can in a safe and sound way and also help the community.
This is certainly a role different from any that we have played in
the past in promoting trust, understanding and -- ultimately -- working
relationships between the private and public sectors for community
development. These partnerships would bring business judgment into the
community development process -- that is good for everyone: for the
community and for business.
Our approach means thinking locally and acting locally. It means
providing a base on which local businesses can be established and can
grow -- creating jobs -- which, in turn, create home ownership
opportunities -- community by community.
A friend of mine tells the story of two people who were walking
along the beach after low tide stranded thousands and thousands of star
fish along the shore -- where they were drying out in the hot sun. Every
time one man came across a star fish, he would pick it up and throw it into
the water. The other man finally said to him: "Why do you keep doing
that -- there are thousands of star fish on the shore -- why does it
matter?" The first man replied: "It matters to each star fish."
Community development -- each community by each community --
matters.
One such community where it matters is East Palo Alto, California.
Last year, we brought together representatives from 17 banks in the San
Francisco area with community group representatives, local officials, and
business people in East Palo Alto to talk about community development.
The banks ranged from Bank of America and Home Federal Savings and
Loan to the Bank of Los Altos, with $74 million in assets. The City of East
Palo Alto was represented, as was local business, such as Bains Moving &
Storage.
About 25,000 people live in East Palo Alto -- and almost 90 percent
of them are minorities. One-third of the residents speak Spanish.
Per capita income in East Palo Alto is less than half of that of its
surrounding county -- San Mateo -- and less than a third of neighboring
Palo Alto. There is not a lot of business locally. There are no large- or
medium-sized commercial enterprises in East Palo Alto -- its businesses
are primarily small retail enterprises and restaurants. Almost half of
these businesses -- 46 percent -- are operated out of homes and garages.
Before we brought the bankers together with the folks in East Palo
Alto, there were no depository institutions there and no automated teller
machines. The only financial institutions in the neighborhood were check
cashing stores.
The community representatives wanted to make the case that East
Palo Alto was a market opportunity. They succeeded -- after the meeting,
Wells Fargo Bank committed to create a branch in East Palo Alto that will
be located in a newly developed retail mall anchored by a Home Depot
store.
Most people in America would not find that a big deal -- retail
malls with bank branches and home supply stores are common enough to
be unremarkable. In East Palo Alto, they hold out the promise of a
turnaround in the community's economy.
Eagle Butte, South Dakota, is a long way from San Mateo County -- in
more ways than just geography. Eagle Butte is on the Cheyenne River
Sioux Indian Reservation.
For years, local banks have been reluctant to lend on the
reservation because the tribe is a sovereign nation with its own contract
laws and without clear ways to establish security interests in collateral.
Last May, the FDIC brought representatives from seven local
financial institutions -- State Bank of Eagle Butte, 1st Financial Bank
South Dakota of Dupree, Community First State Bank in Gettysburg,
Farmers and Merchants Bank & Trust of McIntosh, Bank West, Inc. in
Pierre, Bank of Hovan and Dewey County Bank in Timber Lake -- and
two representatives of the South Dakota Bankers Association together
with 11 members of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe to discuss economic
development on the reservation. This meeting in Eagle Butte went far in
establishing an effective working relationship among the participants, who
agreed to continue to meet. This group most recently met in mid-July and
will meet again in early September. The parties are working together so
productively that the FDIC will stand aside and turn the sponsorship and
management of the meetings over to other participants.
The bankers made their case concerning their uncertainty about
the tribe's contract law and their resulting hesitancy to lend -- and the
tribe is now working on adopting the South Dakota Uniform Commercial
Code as the tribe's contract code. To make this job easier, the South
Dakota Bankers Association provided the tribe with a copy of the state's
U.C.C. on CD-ROM.
Further, the Cheyenne River Sioux hope to share this ground-breaking
U.C.C. work with other tribes so that they, too, can benefit.
In South Carolina we took the same approach. Last year, we
brought together 12 local community development representatives with
bankers -- mostly CEOs -- from the ten banks supervised by the FDIC in
Greenville and Spartanburg counties to talk about community
development. We also sponsored a follow-up meeting. Since then the
group has met five more times -- without the need for our sponsorship.
Being able to stand aside is the surest sign of success in our role as
catalyst.
The banks have created a loan consortium for minority business
lending and they are formulating uniform small business applications to
be used by all the banks to make it easier to apply for loans. In addition,
they are developing a program of technical assistance for minority small
business people -- precisely the kind of "relationship banking" for which
banks have been traditionally noted -- and valued.
Hudson Barksdale, the director of Spartanburg's Southside
Neighborhood Action Partnership, participated in the South Carolina
meetings, and he has summed up his experience this way: "I went into the
process not trusting banks. I've been pleasantly surprised. I'm glad to
see they are open to ideas. I have more respect for the banking
community."
In September this group will sponsor a local seminar on small
business lending -- with an emphasis on technical assistance -- followed by
a program that will permit attendees to meet with local bankers one-on-one.
This success is about as close to grass-roots community development
as one can get.
Our new approach may not transform the world -- but it is
transforming East Palo Alto, Eagle Butte, Greenville/Spartanburg, and
other communities into places where people have greater opportunities.
Before you can have community development, you have to have a
sense of community, the sense of being on the same lake, even if we are in
different boats -- what affects one, affects all. In promoting that sense of
community, we are promoting community development.
Here in Salt Lake City, the FDIC has been meeting with the Utah
Nonprofit Housing Corporation, the Salt Lake City Neighborhood
Housing Services; the Utah Technology Finance Corporation; the Utah
Microenterprise Loan Fund; the Salt Lake Community Action Program
and Artspace -- which creates affordable housing and studios for artists --
to identify the areas where we can be a useful catalyst in helping banks
and community groups identify good business opportunities that also help
their community.
We are putting our imagination and creativity to good use to help
Americans work together productively.
In doing so, we take inspiration from the example of George B.
Dantzig.
Mr. Dantzig was a graduate student in mathematics at Stanford
University when he arrived late for a statistics class one day. Finding two
problems written on the chalkboard, he assumed they were homework, so
he jotted them down in his notebook and, over the next few of days, he
worked them out. He then turned them in to the professor.
Not long thereafter, the professor suggested that Mr. Dantzig
publish his answers. The two problems were not a homework assignment
after all -- they were problems previously thought to be insoluble that the
professor had used as examples. Because Mr. Dantzig arrived late for
class, he did not know the problems were insoluble. No one told him. He
was free to bring his imagination and creativity to bear.
In the new Community Reinvestment Act regulations, federal bank
and thrift supervisors made it easier for lenders to put imagination and
creativity to good use in community development -- we opened up new
possibilities to create partnerships to promote home ownership and
revitalize neighborhoods -- a fact not lost on any of you, I am sure. The
process of community development may call on financial institutions to
reexamine how they do business. As never before, it calls on everyone
involved to open his or her mind to new ideas and new opportunities.
As the example of George B. Dantzig shows, even the insoluble
problem can be solved if you bring innovation and creativity to bear. The
problems of community development can be difficult but are far from
insoluble if we work together, and, like the man on the beach saving star
fish, if we recognize the importance of each one.
Thank you.
|