|
Home > About FDIC > Publications & Documents > Discontinued Publications |
|||
|
Survey of Real Estate Trends |
||
|
July 1996
Highlights
Introduction
The FDIC's Survey of Real Estate Trends detected continued improvements in
both commercial and residential real estate markets during the prior three months. In fact, the
latest results were the most upbeat in over a year. The survey reflected positive trends in market
activity in many areas of the nation, with reports of gains up notably in the Northeast and the
West. However, the proportion of respondents seeing better market conditions in the South and
the Midwest remained the same or declined following reports in April of significant increases,
especially in the residential sector. The quarterly survey, conducted in late July, asks field
personnel from all federal bank and thrift regulatory agencies about developments during the
prior three months in their local real estate markets.
Overview: Summary Indices Real estate market changes over the three months ending in July 1996 The July uptick represents the second consecutive increase in the summary index from its recent low of 60 in January. Although the improvement in the index was not as strong as in the previous survey, the July composite index is the highest reading in two years.
Survey respondents in July continued to be confident about residential markets. Forty-five
percent observed better conditions in their local housing markets, the same proportion reported
previously; however, those noting worsening conditions in July fell to 8 percent. The national
summary index for residential markets inched up to 69 from 68 in April. The July results
received a substantial boost from gains in the West where 66 percent reported better housing
markets -- up from 54 percent in April. Changing assessment of real estate conditions Likewise, overall assessments of commercial real estate trends continued to be positive. An increasing proportion of survey participants observed improving conditions (38 percent) while reports of worsening conditions were very few (one percent). As a result, the composite index for commercial markets rose to 68 in July from 66 in April.
The composite index and other indices reported below summarize responses to the question of
whether real estate markets have improved, deteriorated, or remained the same during the prior
three months. Values above 50 indicate that more examiners and asset managers at federal bank
and thrift regulatory agencies thought conditions were improving rather than declining. Values
below 50 indicate the opposite. A value of 50 indicates either a balance between those
reporting improving versus worsening conditions or agreement that conditions were unchanged.
Percent of respondents reporting commercial real estate markets were... Observers See Continued Improvements in Housing MarketsIn January, the relatively weak readings at the time were thought to "signal a stalling of the recovery in housing markets." Subsequent gains reported in the April and July surveys indicate that overall conditions in housing markets have indeed turned around. Moreover, answers to follow-up questions on housing conditions reinforce the conclusion that this sector is once again picking up.
When asked about existing home sales, respondents were quite positive. The highest proportion
in more than two years reported that the volume of existing home sales was "above-average" (42
percent) and noted that resale prices had increased during the prior three months (51 percent).
Below-average sales volumes were cited by fewer respondents (12 percent) than at any time
since the survey began; a year ago, one-quarter of the respondents saw weak resales. Percent of respondents in July reporting existing home sales were... Percent of respondents reporting increasing residential real estate prices Furthermore, reports of increasing home resale prices outnumbered reports of price declines by almost a nine-to-one margin. In fact, the proportion of respondents noting decreasing prices was the lowest of any survey to date (six percent). The incidence of rising home resale prices was particularly evident in the West, where 53 percent of respondents noted increases, up 20 percentage points from April. Price appreciation was reported most frequently in Colorado, Utah, and Oregon.
Only 24 percent of respondents in July noted excess supply in their local housing markets -- a
new survey low. For the first time, a majority of respondents in the Northeast characterized
supply in their local housing market as "in balance." Consistent with the paring down of excess
supply, the survey results also indicate improvement in residential construction activity. The
proportion reporting new home construction at average or above-average levels rose to 85
percent. Reports of new home construction increasing at above-average levels were more
frequent in July than in April in every region, with the biggest gains reported in the Northeast
and the South. Percent of respondents reporting excess supply in real estate markets Further Strengthening Reported in Commercial MarketsSurvey participants in July noted considerable improvement in many aspects of commercial activity. In addition to seeing a steady decline in excess supply of commercial real estate in a growing number of markets, increasing demand for office space was noted by 28 percent of the respondents, the highest percentage to date.
Assessments of commercial property transactions continued to be increasingly positive.
Nationally, 83 percent of the observers cited commercial sales activity at average or
above-average levels, up from 73 percent in April. Furthermore, fewer respondents (16 percent)
rated
commercial sales as sub-par than in any previous survey. Although weak sales continued to be
cited most frequently on both coasts, above-average commercial sales were much higher than a
year ago in the Northeast (16 percent from four percent) and the West (20 percent from 12
percent). Percent of respondents reporting average or above-average sales of commercial properties July's report of rising commercial property prices reflects the improved sales pace and general tightening of commercial markets nationally. The almost 40 percent observing increasing sales prices was the most favorable assessment since the survey began. The proportion of respondents citing increasing prices was up sharply in July in all regions except the Midwest. It should be noted, however, that most respondents across the nation still report stable prices in commercial property prices in their local markets.Percent of respondents reporting increasing commercial real estate prices
Regional Trends
Evaluations of real estate market trends in both the Midwest and the South remained positive.
Although observers in both regions reported some weakening in residential markets, the regional
composite indices remained at high levels in July (Midwest, 65, and South, 70). Overall gains in
residential markets were particularly prevalent in the "East South Central" states (Kentucky,
Tennessee, Alabama and Mississippi) and in the Pacific coast states. Percent of respondents reporting improved residential real estate market conditions The recovery in the Northeast's commercial and residential real estate markets strengthened somewhat in July after market readings backtracked in early 1996. While reports of better market trends and conditions are still not as frequent as two years ago, recent improvements have been noted in many facets of the region's real estate markets.Changing assessments of real estate conditions in the northeast For instance, 28 percent of those surveyed in the Northeast reported improving commercial markets during the previous three months, in contrast to the same response from only 11 percent a year earlier. This improvement was attributed to rising commercial sale prices and property sales as well as increased demand for office space.
Residential markets in the Northeast also rebounded during the May-July period from a
relatively sluggish late 1995 and early 1996. The highest proportion of respondents to date, 28
percent, reported above-average home sales. Furthermore, 36 percent observed increasing sale
prices, up from 25 percent three months ago. In addition, stronger assessments of both new
home and apartment construction were recorded in the Northeast region.
Data and Method of Presentation
The survey consisted of 316 interviews of examiners and asset managers experienced in
evaluating real estate loan portfolios or marketing real estate assets. The respondents at the
FDIC represent the most senior experts from the Division of Supervision and from the Division
of Depositor and Asset Services. Senior real estate examiners from the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve System, and the Office of Thrift
Supervision also participated. It should be noted that the number of respondents in the survey is
down considerably from the 500-plus when the survey was initiated in 1991. This decline
reflects the fact that the survey included a large number of asset managers at the RTC, which
sunset at year-end 1995.
The survey was designed and analyzed by the Economic Analysis Section, Division of Research
and Statistics at the FDIC. Questions may be directed to James L. Freund (202-898-3960),
Cynthia Angell (202-898-8548), or Daniel Bean (202-898-3931). Geri Bonebrake and Donna
Schull provided production support. Market Facts, Inc. conducted the survey under the
management of Kent R. Kroeger.
|
SUMMARY INDICES OF REAL ESTATE TRENDS
| Composite | Commercial | Residential | |
| U.S. | 68 | 68 | 69 |
| Northeast | 63 | 63 | 64 |
| South | 70 | 70 | 69 |
| Midwest | 65 | 67 | 62 |
| West | 78 | 72 | 81 |
|
Improving
market: Index Value > 50
Declining market: Index Value > 50 Notes to Users: The indices presented above were compiled for both residential and commercial real estate markets for the four major U.S. Census Bureau regions. Each regional index is a summary measure of the respondents' opinions about changes in market conditions in the past three months. The number of respondents by region was: Northeast (60), South (106), Midwest (90) and West (60). The national totals include a small number of responses that could not be classified by region. In constructing the index, a value of 100 was assigned to responses indicating the conditions were "better," and a value of 0 was given to responses saying conditions were "worse." A "no change" answer was assigned a value of 50. Commercial and residential indices at the regional level are the sum of these values divided by the number of respondents in that region for that type of property. Composite indices at the regional level are the weighted average of the residential and commercial indices for each region. The weights for each region are calculated using the value of construction permits for residential and commercial markets from 1982-1991. National indices are weighted averages of the comparable market measure of each region. The data for both the residential and commercial market weights are from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. An index value of 50 indicates that the examiners and liquidators responding to the survey believe there has been no change in trends over the last three months. In this case, the opinion of respondents is either unanimous that there has been no change or is, on average, evenly distributed between those who believe the market has improved and those who believe the market has declined. An index above 50 generally indicates that, in the opinion of most respondents, the market has improved over the last three months, while an index below 50 indicates a belief that market conditions have declined over the period. The further the index is from 50 -- either higher or lower -- the more there is agreement among the respondents about recent market trends. Census Regions: Northeast - Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont South - Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Midwest - Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin West - Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming OVERVIEW **REAL ESTATE TRENDS** COMMERCIAL MARKETS "What would you say is the general direction of the commercial market now compared with three months ago?" |
A Lot Better | A Little Better | Same | A Little Worse | A Lot Worse | Not Sure | Index* |
|
| All | 3% | 35% | 61% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 68 |
| Northeast | 0% | 28% | 70% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 63 |
| South | 3% | 39% | 56% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 70 |
| Midwest | 3% | 32% | 63% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 67 |
| West | 5% | 39% | 55% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 72 |
|
RESIDENTIAL MARKETS
"What would you say is the general direction of the residential market now compared with three months ago?" |
A Lot Better | A Little Better | Same | A Little Worse | A Lot Worse | Not Sure | Index* |
|
| All | 5% | 40% | 47% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 69 |
| Northeast | 2% | 31% | 62% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 64 |
| South | 6% | 37% | 53% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 69 |
| Midwest | 3% | 38% | 42% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 62 |
| West | 7% | 59% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 81 |
|
**CURRENT REAL ESTATE CONDITIONS**
COMMERCIAL MARKETS "In general, how would you characterize the commercial real estate market?" |
Tight Supply | Supply and Demand Roughly in Balance | Excess Supply | Not Sure |
|
| All | 6% | 64% | 30% | 0% |
| Northeast | 4% | 39% | 57% | 0% |
| South | 6% | 71% | 23% | 0% |
| Midwest | 3% | 80% | 17% | 0% |
| West | 7% | 52% | 36% | 0% |
|
RESIDENTIAL MARKETS
"In general, how would you characterize the residential real estate market?" |
Tight Supply | Supply and Demand Roughly in Balance | Excess Supply | Not Sure |
|
| All | 12% | 64% | 24% | 0% |
| Northeast | 9% | 50% | 41% | 0% |
| South | 9% | 73% | 19% | 0% |
| Midwest | 17% | 70% | 13% | 0% |
| West | 15% | 34% | 31% | 0% |
|
**KEY MARKET INDICATORS**
RESIDENTIAL "How would you characterize the current volume of home sales?" |
Much Higher than Average | Somewhat Above Average | About Average | Somewhat Below Average | Much Below Average | Not Sure |
|
| All | 4% | 38% | 46% | 12% | 0% | 0% |
| Northeast | 2% | 26% | 53% | 19% | 0% | 0% |
| South | 5% | 41% | 46% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
| Midwest | 5% | 43% | 42% | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| West | 2% | 36% | 48% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
| "How would you characterize sales prices of existing homes?" |
Increasing Rapidly | Increasing Moderately | Holding Steady | Decreasing Moderately | Decreasing Rapidly | Not Sure |
|
| All | 2% | 49% | 43% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| Northeast | 0% | 36% | 53% | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| South | 0% | 50% | 48% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| Midwest | 1% | 61% | 34% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| West | 9% | 44% | 39% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
| "How would you characterize the current volume of new home construction?" |
Much Higher than Average | Somewhat Above Average | About Average | Somewhat Below Average | Much Below Average | Not Sure |
|
| All | 8% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 1% | 0% |
| Northeast | 4% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 5% | 0% |
| South | 10% | 45% | 41% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
| Midwest | 8% | 44% | 39% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
| West | 9% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 2% | 0% |
| "How would you characterize the current volume of rental apartment construction?" |
Much Higher than Average | Somewhat Above Average | About Average | Somewhat Below Average | Much Below Average | Not Sure |
|
| All | 7% | 24% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 0% |
| Northeast | 2% | 4% | 25% | 46% | 23% | 0% |
| South | 12% | 38% | 37% | 10% | 2% | 0% |
| Midwest | 7% | 23% | 49% | 17% | 14% | 0% |
| West | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 0% |
|
**KEY MARKET INDICATORS**
COMMERCIAL "How would you characterize vacancy rates in commercial real estate?" |
Much Higher than Average | Somewhat Above Average | About Average | Somewhat Below Average | Much Below Average | Not Sure |
|
| All | 1% | 24% | 47% | 25% | 2% | 0% |
| Northeast | 5% | 42% | 35% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
| South | 1% | 15% | 54% | 29% | 2% | 0% |
| Midwest | 0% | 16% | 56% | 26% | 2% | 0% |
| West | 0% | 34% | 36% | 25% | 5% | 0% |
| "How would you characterize the volume of sales of commercial real estate properties?" |
Much Higher than Average | Somewhat Above Average | About Average | Somewhat Below Average | Much Below Average | Not Sure |
|
| All | 0% | 21% | 62% | 16% | 0% | 0% |
| Northeast | 0% | 16% | 54% | 29% | 2% | 0% |
| South | 0% | 24% | 69% | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| Midwest | 0% | 23% | 63% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
| West | 2% | 18% | 56% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
| "How would you characterize commercial real estate sales prices?" |
Increasing Rapidly | Increasing Moderately | Holding Steady | Decreasing Moderately | Decreasing Rapidly | Not Sure |
|
| All | 0% | 39% | 57% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| Northeast | 0% | 28% | 63% | 7% | 2% | 0% |
| South | 1% | 38% | 60% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
| Midwest | 0% | 45% | 54% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
| West | 0% | 43% | 52% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
| "How common are rent concessions now compared with three months ago?" |
Much More Frequently | Somewhat More Frequently | About the Same | Somewhat Less Frequently | Much Less Frequently | Not Sure |
|
| All | 0% | 2% | 69% | 27% | 2% | 0% |
| Northeast | 0% | 2% | 70% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
| South | 1% | 3% | 68% | 25% | 3% | 0% |
| Midwest | 0% | 1% | 65% | 32% | 1% | 0% |
| West | 0% | 0% | 75% | 21% | 4% | 0% |
| "How would you characterize the demand for new office space in your area now compared with three months ago?" |
Much Higher | Somewhat Higher | About the Same | Somewhat Lower | Much Lower | Not Sure |
|
| All | 1% | 27% | 67% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
| Northeast | 0% | 21% | 70% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
| South | 1% | 31% | 63% | 4% | 1% | 0% |
| Midwest | 1% | 25% | 71% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| West | 0% | 29% | 64% | 7% | 0% | 0% |
|
* See above "Summary Indices of Real Estate Trends" for an
explanation of the Index.
NOTE: Percentages are calculated by dividing the number of responses in each category within each region by that region's total number of respondents. Numbers may not sum to 100 due to rounding error. |
Last Updated 8/12/1999
insurance-research@fdic.gov