
|
New Jersey State Profile - Winter 2003
The New Jersey economy is growing, with jobs being added in all of
the state's metropolitan areas and across most industry sectors through
third quarter 2003.
- Employment performance in New Jersey has exceeded the nation for
two years, and continues to show signs of strength (see Chart
1). For the first time since March 2001, the state's eight
metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) recorded year-over-year job growth
in third quarter 2003.
[D]
- The Monmouth-Ocean, Middlesex, Atlantic-Cape May, and Bergen-Passaic MSAs
all underperformed the statewide job growth rate. Monmouth-Ocean's
growth was held back by losses in the retail trade and financial industries,
and Middlesex's growth was stunted by continued losses in the professional
and business services sector. Atlantic-Cape May and Bergen-Passaic
continue to lose manufacturing jobs.
- Job growth continues in many of the state's larger industry sectors,
while, with few exceptions, job losses appear to be contained mostly
in the state's smaller sectors (see Chart 2).
Some of New Jersey's largest industries in terms of jobs such as education
and health services, retail trade, government, and professional and
business services are among the growing sectors. Information (including
telecoms), utilities, and transportation are among those sectors still
losing jobs.
[D]
- The rate of home price appreciation across New Jersey has slowed
from the torrid pace of a year ago, though the state still enjoys net
inward migration. While currently there is no “bursting bubble,” the
rates of appreciation in the state's eight metro areas have declined
from their peaks. Only three areas, Atlantic-Cape May, Jersey
City and Monmouth-Ocean, are still growing at double
digit rates through third quarter 2003. These areas include suburbs
of New York City, and in addition to the
in-migration, some of the appreciation may be attributed to structural
rigidities in the market, namely zoning restrictions and lack of space
for new building.
- The Northern New Jersey office market improved modestly in third
quarter 2003. According to Torto-Wheaton Research, the
aggregate vacancy rate declined slightly to 16.7 percent in third quarter
2003. Completions fell slightly, while net absorption increased substantially
(see Chart 3). The two weakest submarkets
in northern New Jersey were Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon and Monmouth-Ocean.
Not coincidentally, these two metro areas were also among the weakest
in the state in terms of job growth.
[D]
The net interest margin (NIM) reported by the state's insured institutions
declined steadily through mid-2003. Steepening in the yield curve could
provide relief to NIMs but may pose some challenges.
- NIMs among the state's insured institutions contracted in the first
half 2003 (see Chart 4). A 45-year low in
long-term interest rates reached in June 2003 contributed to a decline
in asset yields, while deposit costs neared floors.
[D]
- Long-term interest rates increased during the third quarter 2003,
which contributed to a steepening of the yield curve. Although a steeper
yield curve is traditionally positive for bank NIMs, insured institutions
with high levels of long-term assets may not immediately benefit from
increased long-term rates. Rising long-term interest rates may lead
to moderation in demand for residential mortgages, an important source
of fee income.
- The state's median ratio of long-term assets-to-average earning assets
traditionally is above the nation (see Chart 5).
A large proportion of residential mortgage lenders (37 percent of the
state's insured institutions specialize in mortgage lending) and the
popularity of long-term mortgage products in metropolitan areas of
the Northeast contributed to the higher ratio.1 Additionally,
liability maturities are comparatively shorter, as most liabilities
mature or reprice within three years. Insured institutions with large
concentrations of long-term assets coupled with maturity mismatches
between in assets and liabilities could face some margin compression,
asset depreciation, and extension in asset duration should interest
rates rise. This heightens the importance of proper interest rate risk
management.
[D]
Insured institutions headquartered in New Jersey continued to report
favorable asset quality; however, exposure to typically higher-risk loans
has increased.
- The median past-due loan ratio slightly increased in the first half
2003 but was lower than levels recorded in the prior two years and
less than half the national rate, reflecting, in part, the state's
more favorable economic performance relative to the nation (see Chart
6).
[D]
- The percentage of New Jersey's insured institutions holding concentrations
of traditionally higher-risk loans (HRL) has increased in recent years.2 As
of June 2003, 40 percent of the state's insured institutions reported
HRL concentrations of at least 300 percent of capital, up from 24 percent
five years ago. Almost 40 percent of these institutions were chartered
during the 1990s expansion.
1 “Residential lenders” are defined as insured institutions
that hold at least 50 percent of assets in 1-4 family mortgage loans
and mortgage backed securities.
2 “Higher risk loans” are defined as commercial and industrial,
commercial real estate, and construction and development loans.
New Jersey at a Glance
| General Information |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Institutions (#) |
147 |
153 |
151 |
149 |
145 |
| Total Assets (in thousands) |
146,129,965 |
127,334,658 |
111,729,706 |
160,260,179 |
145,349,084 |
| New Institutions (# < 3
years) |
11 |
21 |
29 |
23 |
19 |
| New Institutions (# < 9
years) |
43 |
43 |
43 |
36 |
27 |
| |
| Capital |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Tier 1 Leverage (median) |
8.86 |
9.70 |
10.54 |
9.64 |
9.31 |
| |
| Asset Quality |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Past-Due and Nonaccrual (median %) |
0.77% |
0.93% |
0.83% |
0.88% |
1.26% |
| Past-Due and Nonaccrual ≥ 5% |
4 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
14 |
| ALLL/Total Loans (median %) |
1.04% |
0.98% |
0.96% |
0.90% |
0.95% |
| ALLL/Noncurrent Loans (median multiple) |
2.51 |
2.17 |
2.11 |
1.95 |
1.36 |
| Net Loan Losses/Loans (aggregate) |
0.13% |
0.24% |
0.23% |
0.29% |
0.28% |
| |
| Earnings |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Unprofitable Institutions (#) |
14 |
21 |
26 |
23 |
20 |
| Percent Unprofitable |
9.52% |
13.73% |
17.22% |
15.44% |
13.79% |
| Return on Assets (median %) |
0.82 |
0.83 |
0.66 |
0.78 |
0.77 |
| 25th Percentile |
0.46 |
0.52 |
0.26 |
0.42 |
0.45 |
| Net Interest Margin (median %) |
3.60% |
3.73% |
3.51% |
3.74% |
3.60% |
| Yield on Earning Assets (median) |
5.35% |
6.22% |
7.13% |
7.33% |
7.00% |
| Cost of Funding Earning Assets (median) |
1.78% |
2.39% |
3.70% |
3.62% |
3.34% |
| Provisions to Avg. Assets (median) |
0.07% |
0.10% |
0.08% |
0.07% |
0.08% |
| Noninterest Income to Avg. Assets (median) |
0.35% |
0.38% |
0.37% |
0.38% |
0.36% |
| Overhead to Avg. Assets (median) |
2.65% |
2.79% |
2.83% |
2.72% |
2.66% |
| |
| Liquidity/Sensitivity |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Loans to Deposits (median %) |
66.22% |
69.23% |
69.75% |
71.25% |
68.67% |
| Loans to Assets (median %) |
56.58% |
57.40% |
58.23% |
58.77% |
56.36% |
| Brokered Deposits (# of institutions) |
21 |
18 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
| Bro. Deps./Assets (median for above inst.) |
3.71% |
5.43% |
11.54% |
1.42% |
0.93% |
| Noncore Funding to Assets (median) |
15.42% |
14.94% |
13.74% |
13.79% |
10.89% |
| Core Funding to Assets (median) |
73.07% |
73.98% |
73.08% |
74.05% |
76.74% |
| |
| Bank Class |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| State Nonmember |
51 |
52 |
51 |
48 |
43 |
| National |
22 |
24 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
| State Member |
6 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
| S&L |
11 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
16 |
| Savings Bank |
31 |
34 |
34 |
31 |
29 |
| Mutually Insured |
26 |
26 |
26 |
27 |
26 |
| |
| MSA Distribution |
# of Inst. |
Assets |
% Inst. |
% Assets |
|
| Newark NJ PMSA |
32 |
15,152,863 |
21.77% |
10.37% |
|
| Bergen-Passaic NJ PMSA |
27 |
48,505,884 |
18.37% |
33.19% |
|
| Philadelphia PA-NJ PMSA |
21 |
19,147,429 |
14.29% |
13.10% |
|
| Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon NJ PMSA |
21 |
28,635,423 |
14.29% |
19.60% |
|
| Monmouth-Ocean NJ PMSA |
11 |
6,341,242 |
7.48% |
4.34% |
|
| Jersey City NJ PMSA |
11 |
17,109,331 |
7.48% |
11.71% |
|
| Trenton NJ PMSA |
10 |
5,512,315 |
6.80% |
3.77% |
|
| Atlantic-Cape May NJ PMSA |
9 |
2,351,653 |
6.12% |
1.61% |
|
| Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton NJ PMSA |
5 |
3,373,825 |
3.40% |
2.31% |
|
|