Table 2. The title is "Many Dallas Region Metropolitan Statistical Areas in 2001 Were Hurt by Waning Energy Prices, a Strong U.S. Dollar, and a Weak Technology Sector." A table showing percent change in employment growth and percent change in gross output for the United States and several Dallas Region metropolitan statistical areas. For the United States, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 1.6 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 0.6 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 2.8 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 0.4 percent. For Denver, Colorado, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 3.6 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 2.4 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 6.6 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 2.0 percent. For Austin-San Marcos, Texas, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 5.4 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 2.0 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 10.9 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 2.1 percent. For Boulder-Longmont, Colorado, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 9.4 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 3.1 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 10.7 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 3.0 percent. For Dallas, Texas, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 3.6 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 1.3 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 7.0 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 1.5 percent. For Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 2.7 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 0.4 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 4.9 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 1.3 percent. For Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 2.0 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was minus 0.4 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 3.2 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 0.8 percent. For Albuquerque, New Mexico, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 3.0 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 0.0 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 17.5 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 2.4 percent. For Houston, Texas, employment growth for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 2.8 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 0.6 percent. Gross output for the year ending fourth-quarter 2000 was 4.4 percent; for the year ending fourth-quarter 2001 it was 0.3 percent.